Feds Delay Canadian Gun-Tracing Regulations For Seventh Time

The Canadian federal government has put the brakes on a gun-tracing regulation that would require every firearm be stamped with an identifiable marking.

The measure is intended to help police track lost or stolen firearms, or firearms that have been used in the course of a crime. The law was supposed to take effect Dec. 1, but Canadian legislature has pushed back the initiative for the seventh time in a row, this time until June 1, 2017.

If the measure ever does get turned into law, all domestically manufactured firearms would be required to be bear the name of the manufacturer, serial number, and “Canada” or “CA.” And imported firearms would be required to bear “Canada” or “CA” and the last two digits of the year of import.

Many Canadian police agencies support the measure, claiming it would help them solve gun-related crimes more quickly. The Coalition for Gun Control agrees, and says the bill is a must-have for law enforcement.

“Given the problems with smuggled guns internationally and on the streets of Canadian cities it is, of course, disappointing that the Canadian government has once again delayed implementing this critical set of measures,” said coalition president Wendy Cukier.

However, others argue the marking all firearms within the country will be a costly waste of time that won’t help law enforcement in the least.

“We’ve been advising them to completely dispense with this,” said National Firearms Association spokesman Blair Hagen. “Because there’s absolutely no rational argument for imposing these type of regulations on the Canadian firearms industry. It will put a lot of businesses out of business.”

The Canadian government has pushed back the bill multiple times, but they haven’t shut it down completely, leaving plenty of room for lawmakers to come up with a revised bill.

“During the deferral period, a marking scheme could be determined that will enable law enforcement to trace crime guns and permit Canada to assist international investigations without imposing unnecessary burdens on firearms businesses.”

(This article was a submission from freelance writer Brent Rogers)

{ 2 comments… add one }
  • Mark N. August 20, 2015, 3:15 am

    What makes them think the criminals will bring their guns in to be stamped? Or that smugglers will stamp their firearms? Or knowing who bought the gun originally will help to solve a crime committed with the gun after it has been stolen? Tracing has never made any sense.

    • DIYinSTL July 22, 2016, 10:38 am

      It would be a simple matter for smugglers to spend 1/2 a minute and stamp CA and the year on a contraband firearm, it just won’t be in their data base. Canada would simply need to pass another law against counterfeit firearm stamps and then all of their problems will be solved. A perfect nirvana, eh?

Leave a Comment

Send this to a friend