Subscribe To the GunsAmerica Digest and News This Week

Mike Rowe Delivers Truth Bomb on 2A, Right to Vote

Send to Kindle
mikerowe

Mike Rowe and his companion. (Photo: Facebook)

Adventurer, television personality and internet scribe Mike Rowe delivered a truth bomb on his Facebook page regarding one’s right to vote a few months ago that is now going viral.

What prompted the column was a question from a fan that encouraged Rowe to use the power of his celebrity to turn out the vote this November.

Rowe’s response is quite epic in that he cuts against the grain of conventional wisdom that one should vote simply because one has the right to vote. In many ways, it reminds me of the open carry issue — just because you can carry your black rifle into the Kroger, should you carry your black rifle into Kroger?

Rights come with responsibility, not the least of which are a desire to educate oneself about one’s rights and a healthy self-awareness as to how exercising those rights will effect one’s neighbors, one’s community and one’s country.

While carrying your AK-47 into Kroger may make you feel safe, how does it make your fellow citizens feel? How does it impact the larger mission of the gun community to win hearts and minds? How does it help the fight to protect the 2A from anti-gunners?

Likewise, how does voting for candidate X improve the country? If candidate X is elected, what will happen to our economy? Does candidate X support the Constitution?

Not to get too far off topic, but the Kaepernick story also comes to mind in this context. Specifically, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s response this week when she learned that the football player is exercising his First Amendment right to protest the national anthem by kneeling while it’s played before the start of a game.

“If they want to be stupid, there’s no law that should be preventive,” Justice Ginsburg said. “If they want to be arrogant, there’s no law that prevents them from that. What I would do is strongly take issue with the point of view that they are expressing when they do that.”

So, true. There are always going to be idiots who exercise their rights in a profoundly stupid way. While we shouldn’t outlaw it, we also shouldn’t blindly encourage it.

Anyways, enough of me prattling, check out Rowe’s response and let us know what you think in the comment section below.

###

Jeremy Schneider writes…

Hey Mike, I have nothing but respect for you. Your no-nonsense outlook and incredible eloquence have really had a profound impact in my life. Can you please encourage your huge following to go out and vote this election? I would never impose on you by asking you to advocate one politician over another, but I do feel this election could really use your help. I know that there are many people out there who feel like there is nothing they can do. Please try to use your gifts to make them see that they can do something – that their vote counts.

Hi Jeremy

Thanks for the kind words. I appreciate it. I also share your concern for our country, and agree wholeheartedly that every vote counts. However, I’m afraid I can’t encourage millions of people whom I’ve never met to just run out and cast a ballot, simply because they have the right to vote. That would be like encouraging everyone to buy an AR-15, simply because they have the right to bear arms. I would need to know a few things about them before offering that kind of encouragement. For instance, do they know how to care for a weapon? Can they afford the cost of the weapon? Do they have a history of violence? Are they mentally stable? In short, are they responsible citizens?

Casting a ballot is not so different. It’s an important right that we all share, and one that impacts our society in dramatic fashion. But it’s one thing to respect and acknowledge our collective rights, and quite another thing to affirmatively encourage people I’ve never met to exercise them. And yet, my friends in Hollywood do that very thing, and they’re at it again.

Every four years, celebrities and movie stars look earnestly into the camera and tell the country to “get out and vote.” They tell us it’s our “most important civic duty,” and they speak as if the very act of casting a ballot is more important than the outcome of the election. This strikes me as somewhat hysterical. Does anyone actually believe that Leonardo DiCaprio, Ellen DeGeneres, and Ed Norton would encourage the “masses” to vote, if they believed the “masses” would elect Donald Trump?

Regardless of their political agenda, my celebrity pals are fundamentally mistaken about our “civic duty” to vote. There is simply no such thing. Voting is a right, not a duty, and not a moral obligation. Like all rights, the right to vote comes with some responsibilities, but lets face it – the bar is not set very high. If you believe aliens from another planet walk among us, you are welcome at the polls. If you believe the world is flat, and the moon landing was completely staged, you are invited to cast a ballot. Astrologists, racists, ghost-hunters, sexists, and people who rely upon a Magic 8 Ball to determine their daily wardrobe are all allowed to participate. In fact, and to your point, they’re encouraged.

The undeniable reality is this: our right to vote does not require any understanding of current events, or any awareness of how our government works. So, when a celebrity reminds the country that “everybody’s vote counts,” they are absolutely correct. But when they tell us that “everybody in the country should get out there and vote,” regardless of what they think or believe, I gotta wonder what they’re smoking.

Look at our current candidates. No one appears to like either one of them. Their approval ratings are at record lows. It’s not about who you like more, it’s about who you hate less. Sure, we can blame the media, the system, and the candidates themselves, but let’s be honest – Donald and Hillary are there because we put them there. The electorate has tolerated the intolerable. We’ve treated this entire process like the final episode of American Idol. What did we expect?

So no, Jeremy – I can’t personally encourage everyone in the country to run out and vote. I wouldn’t do it, even if I thought it would benefit my personal choice. Because the truth is, the country doesn’t need voters who have to be cajoled, enticed, or persuaded to cast a ballot. We need voters who wish to participate in the process. So if you really want me to say something political, how about this – read more.

Spend a few hours every week studying American history, human nature, and economic theory. Start with “Economics in One Lesson.” Then try Keynes. Then Hayek. Then Marx. Then Hegel. Develop a worldview that you can articulate as well as defend. Test your theory with people who disagree with you. Debate. Argue. Adjust your philosophy as necessary. Then, when the next election comes around, cast a vote for the candidate whose worldview seems most in line with your own.

Or, don’t. None of the freedoms spelled out in our Constitution were put there so people could cast uninformed ballots out of some misplaced sense of civic duty brought on by a celebrity guilt-trip. The right to assemble, to protest, to speak freely – these rights were included to help assure that the best ideas and the best candidates would emerge from the most transparent process possible.

Remember – there’s nothing virtuous or patriotic about voting just for the sake of voting, and the next time someone tells you otherwise, do me a favor – ask them who they’re voting for. Then tell them you’re voting for their opponent. Then, see if they’ll give you a ride to the polls.

In the meantime, dig into “Economics in One Lesson,” by Henry Hazlitt. It sounds like a snooze but it really is a page turner, and you can download it for free.

Mike

PS. If you do vote, or if you don’t, you’ll almost certainly feel better about the future of our country wearing the latest “Freddy and The BiPed” 2016 Campaign Tee Shirt. This version reads, somewhat prophetically, “A Doghouse Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand.” It can all be yours for $24.99. Slightly more for the hoodie. Proceeds, as always, go to The mikeroweWORKS Foundation, and pay for work-ethic scholarships. represent.com/mikerowe.

{ 17 comments… add one }
  • Patriot October 15, 2016, 5:12 pm

    THIS WAS WRITTEN BY ED ROLLINS WHO IS THE CO-CHAIR OF THE TRUMP GREAT AMERICA PAC. ED ROLLIN’S MENTIONS SEVERAL TIMES THAT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA CONSTANTLY ATTACKS TRUMP AND IGNORES HILLARY. I WISH I KNEW WHAT IS MOTIVATING THE MEDIA. IT IS ABSOLUTELY LUDICROUS TO ELECT ROTTEN TO THE CORE HILLARY WHO HAS SAID SHE WILL DO MANY THINGS BY USING EXECUTIVE ACTION AND WILL BYPASS CONGRESS ( THAT REPRESENTS THE PEOPLE ) JUST AS ANTI-AMERICAN OBAMA HAS DONE. I FEEL SURE YOU KNOW, OBAMA HAS RELEASED THE GUANTANAMO TERRORISTS AND WANTS TO CLOSE GUANTANAMO AND GIVE IT TO COMMUNIST CUBA. OBAMA AND HILLARY SUPPORT AN “OPEN BORDER” TO MEXICO AND SAY THEY WILL LET TEN MILLION ILLEGAL ALIENS IMMIGRATE TO THE UNITED STATES. HILLARY IS TOTALLY AGAINST THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND WILL USE EXECUTIVE ACTION TO DRASTICALLY WEAKEN THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. HILLARY ALSO INTENDS TO APPOINT U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES THAT WILL SUPPORT HER DERANGED OBJECTIVES FOR SEVERAL DECADES. AS YOU KNOW, FOR WHATEVER REASON, THE ASININE MEDIA ALREADY SUPPORTS THE TERRIBLE CHANGES SHE INTENDS TO MAKE IN THE USA. HILLARY INTENDS TO BE A FOLLOWER OF OBAMA !!

    VOTE FOR TRUMP AND REPUBLICANS !!!!

    As the mainstream media constantly attacks Trump, ignoring Hillary, it’s time for Americans to decide: do you trust the media reporting of this election?

    Who do you trust?

    Donald Trump
    or

    Mainstream Media
    (Pick One)

    You see, the mainstream media continues to ignore the three decades of corruption that have followed the Clinton dynasty. Their mission is to elect Hillary Clinton as the next president.

    The Wikileaks emails reveal many horrifying details of the Clinton campaign:

    — “Hillary hates everyday Americans” — 04/19/2015
    — Hillary’s Communications Director viciously attacks American Catholics declaring: “they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn’t understand if they became evangelicals.”
    — Just how cozy the mainstream media is supporting and editing articles to aid the Clinton campaign

    But you won’t hear any of this from the mainstream media. That’s why we need to hear from you ASAP!

    Who do you trust?

    Donald Trump
    or

    Mainstream Media
    (Pick One)

    Friend, this is why our work at Great America PAC has been so critical. We’re fighting a multi-front war against the Democrats and their media puppets. We’ve spent millions on radio and TV ads highlighting what the mainstream media seeks to avoid, the truth.

    From the beginning, Great America PAC has sought to rebut the media narrative — and that is why we must have your help to continue fighting as the attacks instensify. The mainstream media is actively doing everything they can to elect Hillary Clinton by deceiving the American people.

    But that will all soon change, you see, we’re so close to electing Donald Trump and putting an end to the media corruption and manipulation of the masses.

    Please, let us know who you believe this election cycle. And if you’re able, make a contribution of $25, $50, or even $500 so Great America PAC can rebut their narrative at a time when it matters most.

    Sincerely,
    Great
    America PAC
    Ed Rollins
    National Co-Chair, Great America PAC

    P.S. 25 days. That’s all we have left to show the American people who’s really fit for office. Please let us know who you believe and then make a contribution so Great America PAC can continue to support Donald Trump in every way possible. Thanks, Ed

  • Bob October 15, 2016, 2:50 pm

    Thanks, Mike. I believe our system of government has rested on a free press and an informed electorate. As we see the free press has been politicized to the point of irrelevancy and the informed electorate now just a memory. Remember when “Civics” was taught in school. There were “Capitalism vs Communism” classes. Now it’s multiculturalism and one world theology. You reap what you sow….While I agree we are all one race on one planet I think these ideas are being advanced now to financially enslave us and to socially drive us back to the stone age. When the ruling elite embrace compassion and altruism the world order will advance. Till then these ideas are just propaganda to ensure compliance.

  • Bob October 15, 2016, 12:24 pm

    Hi Mike,
    I really enjoyed your article and agree, wholeheartedly.
    I am a 72 year old Vietnam Veteran and have never voted. I feel I have the “right” to not vote, as well as, to vote. That being said, I will be voting in this election. Even though all elections and most policy issues are important, this election is of the utmost importance. With the economy and the, possible, multiple appointments of Supreme Court Justices at the forefront, this is, arguably, the most important election, ever.
    I think I heard, somewhere, that Hoover was the last businessman to become president. I could be mistaken. I think it’s time to try another one. Career politicians certainly haven’t done the job.
    Thanks for your opinion and articles on the subject.

  • Josh M October 14, 2016, 6:48 pm

    I would love for someone to find me this “right to vote,” because as Neal Bortz has pointed out many times, we have no Constitutional right to vote in an election. The electoral college currently lets us vote and has decided to go along with popular choices for the most part (Bush v Gore). I really enjoyed Mike Rowe’s comments, with this one exception.

    • Erick October 14, 2016, 11:06 pm

      Josh M,
      There are 4 Constitutional Amendments which state the “right to vote”:
      15th Amendment of the Constitution reads, “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”
      19th Amendment: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”
      24th: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.”
      26th: “The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.”

  • Miguel Raton October 14, 2016, 2:40 pm

    While I approve of his point [one made over 200 years ago by Madison, iirc, or was it Adams?] I’m not too sure of his reading list: Keynes? Marx? Yes, they’re important figures in economics, but neither one is in keeping with responsible finance as is needed in our electorate. [BTW, Marx is completely overrated, he basically just restated Christ’s miracle of loaves & fishes in a political context. You’ll note that none of the supposed adherents to his philosophy run their countries on anything other than a despotic system of rule, with a massive shadow economy that refutes the economy by decree that is the hallmark of all such “communist” nations…] More important to read Milton Friedman than doing anything more than the Cliff’s Notes versions of Marx & Keynes, IMO. 😉

    • Junior Soto October 14, 2016, 4:20 pm

      Raton,

      I think He is just recommending the lectures in the context of what they are (historic or whatever), not telling you to follow them verbatim…

    • Damon October 14, 2016, 7:45 pm

      The fact that you can both intelligently comment on and articulate your position regarding both Keyes and Marx proves Rowe’s point that they are both worth reading. Had you read neither, you would have nothing to add to the discussion.

      PS: I agree with you regarding both authors.

  • noneya October 14, 2016, 1:15 pm

    I have to agree with the point Mr. Rowe is making. I long for the day that those concerned for our country have an proverbial epiphany and realize that you don’t HAVE to vote for either. You can write in your own choice, even if its yourself, a third choice or even a fourth are available if you can be bothered to not accept whats presented. The so called two party system is a contrivance that is long dead; way beyond its usefulness.
    Just vote for the person that has a history of decisions and actions that reflect the values our country was founded on, but that is up to you to find out because you can be sure that the lobbyists and corporate backers (which should be illegal) aren’t going to foot the bill to make that information readily available.

  • DB October 14, 2016, 10:49 am

    You all need to read the Constitution and the ammendments again. The 1st ammentdment has to do with the government suppressing free speech. Kaepernick’s act has NOTHING to do with the 1st amendment. He is in a private location and in a private business. He can be fined and fired for his act.
    Too bad a Supreme Court justice doesn’t even know the difference.

  • George October 14, 2016, 7:27 am

    While I disagree with Mike that whatever I do I should wonder how my fellow citizens will feel about it before I do it, his rant makes for a good read.

    • Jim Dooley October 14, 2016, 8:59 am

      That’s not exactly what he said. He said you should be mindful of how your actions are going to be viewed and how that is going to help or hurt your cause. The more people who carry their AR around “because they can” are going to find their rights are going to come under attack by the scared and misinformed.
      His point is just because you can doesn’t mean you should.

      • Tyrone L. Greene October 14, 2016, 10:14 am

        Or as the Apostle Paul said… “Not all things are expedient.”

  • Darryl October 14, 2016, 4:02 am

    all this just to sale a t-shirt.

    • Shawn Carroll October 14, 2016, 9:27 am

      Very wise words…but still just common sense. People put more time and effort into deciding what wax they are going to use on their car than they do on our polititical system. One thing though….not caring a vote STILL has an effect on the electoral process.

      The difference being if citizenry are non-participants due apathy, or educated noncompliance due to their educated, empassioned stance on the fact that the candidates available are woefully unqualified, morally bankrupt puppets.
      This is going to be a “rebuilding” 4 years….
      Literally.
      I am afraid for all of our children …..

  • Tom Horn October 13, 2016, 10:33 pm

    I was in a large U.S. city recently to attend a wedding. While out on the street I was approached by a liberal, older couple who asked if I was registered to vote. I watched them working the street trying to register anything with a pulse. How about leaving it to the people interested enough to register on their own, to vote.

    • Keith October 14, 2016, 1:09 pm

      Sadly those who wish for a tyrannical government want low information voters. They want people who want to vote for “free stuff.”
      It’s Freedom or free stuff people. Take your pick because you cannot have both.

Leave a Comment

Send this to friend