“Say Hello to my 1st Amendment Cage” – Says DNC

Send to Kindle

Why are liberals so against guns? It doesn’t make any sense right? Everywhere that has implemented strict gun control spirals out off the scale with crime. Why would people who profess to care about others push an agenda that only hurts others?

Well here is your answer. Taking away your guns is about taking away your control. Liberals only can tolerate those who march in lock step. If you fall out of line, we have a cage for you and your ideas about what really will make your life better.

You can’t put people armed with AR-15s in 1st Amendment cages with no recourse.

If you want a video to share with your friends who might be tempted to vote for Hillary, check this one out:

{ 64 comments… add one }
  • heavyduty August 6, 2016, 10:52 am

    Why would people who profess to care about others push an agenda that only hurts others?

    The answer is simple. Liberalism is a incureable mental disease. That’s why.
    End of story.

  • Frank August 3, 2016, 8:29 am

    You all need to study what happened in Australia. Get back to me when you’ve researched that.

  • jl July 30, 2016, 8:53 pm

    Sorry for my spelling and the missed words. I use a tablet and it has a mind of it own. Anyway I hope you all get the point of what I was saying. We need to do what is right. Our Forefathers fought the tenery of a Britain and England to have these right guaranteed by the constitution, so they could live free and have a good life without the government dictating to them what they would take from them and there families. We take for granted the blood that was shed to obtain this freedom. We all should be able to do anything that’s we want as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else. They really want us to be able to vote for thing as a people together to see what the common goals were of the people, and the government serve the people. Not dictate like Obama is doing. As he says, I’ll do it with a stroke of the pen, and not with Congress’s approval. We do need a dictator. We the people will get it done so it represents us as a whole. But we need to call our senators, telling them that they have to vote according to the peoples will. We need them to impeach the dictator Obama for his treasonous crimes against the laws of the Constitution.We need hold him accoaccountable for his actions. The same goes for Hillary Clinton and her role with the emails that she lied about. The death of the Senator, that was caused by her negligence a Head of the State. Anyway enough said. We je3d to get bake to the basics, our country’s Constitution. The absolute best paper any civilization has prepared in this world. I hope that this message finds you and your family doing well. God bless the United States of America! The greatest country that has ever been!

    • SuperG August 1, 2016, 11:51 am

      Some things have come to pass since the founding fathers started our country. They never thought that Congressional Republicans and Democrats would come together to steal from the American public. Now they have legal insider trading and automatic pay raises that take effect unless they vote against it! They also never imagined the apathy of the American voter either. As long as they can afford a shiny new iPhone every year, all is good. It doesn’t matter that there are more and more criminals stealing it, as long as they are not directly affected.

      As for accountability, you saw the head of the FBI excuse Hillary for her crimes, literally. And Obama’s pet dog quickly accepted their “recommendation”. So that should have told you that there are two sets of laws in this country. One set for the rich and connected, and one set for everyone else.

      So the fix is in and Hillary will be our new Queen apparently. She won;t be worth less though, as she’ll drive this country towards revolution. Her first few fiats of attack the Constitution, and excusing racist thugs for their crimes, will be the impetus for it. I hope I’m wrong and Donald wins, but I don’t see the liberals playing by the rules and having a fair election. My thinking is that any career politician who gets into office will give us more of the same, regardless of affiliation.

      • Bob September 12, 2016, 12:37 am

        I have been thinking along these lines myself. I hope I am wrong and the victory for Trump is too big to rig. I have been contributing what I can all along to the effort and I hope others do the same. What is your country worth? If it comes down to it you know what they say about the Tree of Liberty…Molon Labe…

    • David Clark August 3, 2016, 10:08 pm

      There is little or nothing the current crop of socialist/one party government lovers find. As for the First Amendment, what do you think political correction is all about? An extensive list of “words” which have been removed from conversation. Where did this originate? You don’t need to be a trauma surgeon to see it The ironic part is we, the taxpayers are footing the bill!! Our Big Brother government has enabled back breaking debt because whenever the government increased the max loan, Colleges immediately increase their tuition. Is education better because it now costs twice what it did a decade ago? No!!! Yet it’s common for schools to build all sorts of facilities teens would like. 10,000 sq. ft. of video games? And given that 90+% of Of administrators, Professors, teachers, and just about anyone you can name employed by them. Now the TRILLIONS of dollars of student loan debt is going to be forgiven. A misnomer,,,,The better way to state it is the debt will be shifted to(you guessed it) the tax payer.

      Maggie Thatcher: “The problem with socialism is you run out of OTHER peoples money”

  • kevin k. July 30, 2016, 8:25 pm

    And here’s what the corrupt liberal media would not show at the DNC Convention.
    http://www.projectveritasaction.com/video/okeefe-undercover-outraged-dems-dnc
    HRC obtained a court injunction to stop 40,000 Bernie Sanders supporters from holding a rally on Monday.

  • kevin k. July 30, 2016, 7:22 pm

    You think Hillary wants to protect the 2nd Amendment as she stated on Thursday, THINK AGAIN!! Watch the video!
    http://www.projectveritasaction.com/video/undercover-video-hillary-clinton-delegate-hillary-wants-ban-all-guns

  • Jim (Pete) Poteet July 30, 2016, 1:28 pm

    All of you idiots who keep saying “nobody wants to take your guns” is either stupid or a GD liar. Which are you? You know who you are and so do I. America is becoming the country over populated with dumb asses and liars, just like Hillary. FO. Pete

  • Patriot July 30, 2016, 10:38 am

    Pat Bryan,
    Have you made your plans to move to Russia? I am sure you will love living in a country where only the government has guns and control your life. Don’t worry, I am sure you will fit right in and you won’t be bothered by having Constitutional rights

  • Marv July 29, 2016, 6:48 pm

    Angel, I disagree with your poorly thought out diatribe. However, what really irks me is you and the mainstream media refer to Trump supporters as un-educated. I have 6 years worth of college credits which includes a BA and a Masters. Most of my friends who are trump supporters are college educated and own their own businesses. They are well read and follow current affairs from a variety of sources. Wise up and stop drinking the cool aid.

    • Jamie Ennis July 30, 2016, 5:13 am

      Kool aid

      • Tom Horn July 30, 2016, 4:22 pm

        In the case of the Democratic Party, I believe it is pronounced, and spelled, “Fool Aid,” if you want to get technical there, grammar fairy.

  • Tom Horn July 29, 2016, 6:47 pm

    Dear Trolls,

    “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” – Benjamin Franklin

    Go back and study our history before posting.

    • jl July 30, 2016, 9:47 pm

      You are a true looser and a Troll… I may have not went and looked up a exact quote from Benjamin Franklin. But I think that everyone gets the point of what was said. He would roll over in his grave if he knew that America was going to turn out the way it has in the last 7-1/2 years. That your faithful leader Obama has been in control. He is Un-american and should have to face charges and be impeached for treason. Why dont you go live in Russia, because you and Obama don’t belong here. Oh, I guess he is going to live in Dubai. Maybe you can be neighbor together there. I love my country The United States of America, and will do whatever it takes to defend it from both foreign and domestic Terrorist. We the People, not we the government, have the power and need to exercise it. God Bless The USA!

  • jl July 29, 2016, 5:56 pm

    Look the Clinton gun ban back in the 90’s, crime when up 30% according to official FBI statistics. When Bill Clinton’s in his infamous Brady Bill legislation to curb crime with assault rifles ban and hi capacity magazine or clips ban, for those not oriented with guns. When the legislation expired during the Bush administration, violent crime went down by 40% according to official FBI Statistics. Look it up for yourself. You are definitely safer with people owning guns, than without. If you’re asking me how, I will tell you. If they were to take the guns from good law abiding Citizens, do you think a criminal won’t capitalize on the opportunities of of rape pillage and plunder of defenseless individuals with the gun he didn’t turn in as criminal don’t obey laws, hence the term criminal. Criminals love all gun free zones, they don’t. Have to worry about the fact that someone else could be armed. They go through without any issues with resistant, and when the cops with guns finally arrive he or she see the resistance and commit suicide. They are such cowards that they only pray on the innocent. All these hi payed actors and actress have armed body guards, but cry out guns are bad. But you’re not going to see them give up there protection. Are they anymore important than us or our children? What makes them, because so crazy person might rape pillage and plunder their fortunes. Why would anybody want to be protected from this savage criminal or their corrupt government? Mabe look at all the blood that was shed in the name of a free Republic. Not managed by the few, but by the People of this great Country. If you are willing to give up Freedom for a little comfort you deserve neither Freedom or comfort. The cops will show up after the fact that your family was assault and members kill at the hands of the Criminal. They have taken your beautiful daughter and sold her into the hights paying sex Criminal Pigs of this world, to be a sex toy for him and his guest. But you wanted to give up your rights to defend your family with a gun. Or sold our rights down the drain, as I your next door neighbor could have heard the commotion and responded to the threats. And just mabe have stopped the whole thing before it got to far saving your whole family. Also saving your daughters future to not be in the situation of this type of violation. I hope that this will make you think of the consequences of the action of a disarm American public. I am sure it will be much more violent and violating than I have described in today’s paragraph. Pay attention to the politicians that want this to happen. Do they have armed body guards? “Yes”! Do all the actors that promote gun control have armed body guards? “Yes”! So why shouldn’t you and I as responsible people have the same rights? Hope to reach a few people with the message of truth. Thanks and God bless the United States of America!

  • Angel July 29, 2016, 1:26 pm

    I don’t get it, when Reagan pass the ban on high capacity guns it was cheered by conservatives,
    Now y’all being brain wash by radio talk shows NRA oh yeah and Racist Trump.
    No one saying they gonna take your rights to own a gun, but really? You need a machine gun at home? C’mon if you can’t even shoot a 45 to protect your family you shouldn’t even own one.
    All we want is to avoid anyone on the radar from having access to one.
    You agree? Or you too stupid.

    • Derek July 29, 2016, 2:24 pm

      Wow! I don’t know where to begin. First, Reagan did not pass any bans on high capacity guns – so, to say that something that never took place was cheered by conservatives, is FALSE!
      Bill Clinton passed the Brady Bill on November 30, 1993. And then Bill Clinton passed the Assault Weapons Ban on September 13, 1994.
      Do you know what the definition of a “machine gun” is? A few people might want to own one as part of a collection, but I seriously doubt anyone would consider owning one in their home to protect their family!
      By enacting stricter gun laws, it will keep guns out of the hands of law abiding people. Criminals don’t follow laws (guess that’s why they’re called “criminals” duh!) so any laws passed won’t affect them.
      Look at Mexico, with it’s strict gun laws – all of the criminals, drug lords, etc. have tons of guns (thanks in a small part to Eric Holder).
      Stupid…..REALLY!
      Wish these uneducated liberal trolls would find something else to do other than continuing to spread outright LIES!
      One more thing, Trump, he’s not racist.

      • Dad Cat July 29, 2016, 3:30 pm

        POINT OF FACT:
        The President doesn’t PASS any laws.
        He (or She) either can either SIGN them into law, VETO them or take no action at all (a “hip-pocket” veto).
        ONLY Congress has the Constitutional authority to PASS laws and ONLY Congress can override a veto (if it has enough votes).
        That’s what the Constitution says.

        Which does bring into question how Presidential Executive Orders are SUPPOSED to fit into this scheme, as recent Presidents have used this power as a workaround to the legitimate legislative process, in my not so humble opinion.
        Can anyone say “King Obama” . . . sure you can!

        There was a reason the Framers separated the creation of laws from their enforcement (and their interpretation), i.e the separation of powers. After winning our independence from King George III, they wanted to make damn sure it wouldn’t be easy for anyone to amass too much power. The built “tyranny prevention” into our system. That’s also one of the main reasons for the second amendment. Better to have the government fear the people than the other way around. I don’t believe the Framers would approve of the way things have turned out on that score, though.

        Otherwise, I agree with you, Derek.

      • T A July 29, 2016, 3:39 pm

        Derek,
        Criminals get guns through legal channels, last time I checked, gun manufactures don’t sell guns directly to the black market. Private citizens who buy guns legally, either have them stolen because they lack the capacity to safely own a firearm, or they sell them to illegal individuals to make money.
        That is how criminals get guns. Cities with the strict gun laws have guns imported by gun runners from the states with no gun laws, that is how the crime circle works.
        Now I am guessing you are an uneducated republican because you are a Trump supporter so let me make this simple and clear, democrats have never had it in their party agenda to take away guns, what they have proposed is common sense gun laws that help prevent LEGAL CITIZENS from selling guns to people that should not have them. If you are against that, you shouldn’t own a firearm in the first place. Join the rest of America and other safe gun owners by helping elect officials that don’t promote a system that continues to have guns sold to people who’s sole purpose it to commit crimes.

        • Derek July 29, 2016, 4:37 pm

          So private citizens shouldn’t be able to legally buy guns because they are going to be stolen by criminals, or sold to criminals for a profit? What about the criminals that have been caught on surveillance video breaking into gun shops and stealing guns. If a person owns a firearm and it is stored inside a LOCKED home or vehicle, then it is safely secured! No one is asking to have their home or vehicle burglarized!
          Let me make this “simple” and “clear”, democrats have ALWAYS wanted to take away guns! As well as get rid of the constitution and get rid of God!
          I’m guessing, no I’m certain, you are a liberal suffering from some sort of mental illness. So please, do us all big favor and go back to the Hillary blogs/forums where your friends are.

        • Erick July 29, 2016, 5:27 pm

          States with no gun laws? Which states don’t have gun laws?? Every state has a LONG list of laws, statutes and regulations concerning the buying, selling, possession, carrying and manufacturing of firearms.

          Also, the Democrat Party supported and passed the Jim Crow laws which made it illegal for slaves and blacks to own, posses, buy or sale firearms for a very, very long time. Part of the agenda of the slave-abolitionist party (Republican Party – 1800’s) was arming blacks and slaves in order to promote their own self-defense and freedom. Very interesting history. Please double check me and study it yourself! 🙂

          Apart from the history lesson, I find it amusing that you’re thinking in simple-minded terms of “Democrat versus Republican” (and “Trump versus Clinton”), as if Democrats were perfect and could solve all our problems for us….
          I prefer to think in a way of Freedom versus No-Freedom (or Less Freedom). I don’t care which party is in power as long as their principles and goals are that of individual freedom, liberty and prosperity. Unfortunately, too many simpletons think in terms of “Democrat” or “Republican”….*sigh*

        • Dale July 29, 2016, 6:43 pm

          You are and idiot! Between all the state (50, remember…) and federal gun laws there are over 20,000 firearms laws an the books RIGHT NOW

        • Dale July 29, 2016, 6:44 pm

          You are and idiot! Between all the state (50, remember…) and federal gun laws there are over 20,000 firearms laws an the books RIGHT NOW

        • Dale July 29, 2016, 6:50 pm

          20,000 firearms laws on the books right now! What we need are MORE gun owners who are willing to carry their firearms at all times! In states where concealed and open carry are practiced, crime actually goes down! Try reading the book “More guns = less crime” by John Lott.

        • SES July 29, 2016, 7:10 pm

          So “Criminals get guns through legal channels …”? Last time I checked stealing them is a definition of criminal activity, which is not a ‘legal channel’.
          DUH!

        • David Christensen July 30, 2016, 2:54 am

          Do you also buy swamp land in Arizona? Please don’t insult us by talking down. Never assume people are not as smart as you, or you will soon enough be proven the real fool!

    • Joe July 29, 2016, 2:48 pm

      Are you stupid by nature or did your mom let you fall head down when you were a baby? Some DNC trash already said that they want to decide who owns guns and who doesnt. Learn what a machine gun is you idiot, and also learn what anyone need to operate one of them. There are more than 9000 national laws regarding guns right now. Other facts that elude you is that the states with more gun control are the ones with most gun violence and violent crime overall. Another fact for your washed up brain. Criminals dont obey laws you leftard. Do you even know what a Constitutional right is? no you dont , because you are a brainless zombie. These are all facts and then , you come here and call anybody stupid?? That is exactly why we consider all leftards, mentally ill persons that can not fact check or follow common sense. That is why trash like you vote for Hillary, and have the audacity to procreate and create more little retarded lefties.

    • Boss July 29, 2016, 4:20 pm

      Angel, you really are in the outfield. Your calling someone stupid in your pigeon English! Did you get on here to show off your opinionated ignorance and stupidity?
      Trotsky and Lenin would love your brainwashed and gullible little mind. They would call you a useful idiot.

      2/4 3rd MarDiv VN 1967-69

      An armed Citizen is just that a Citizen. and unarmed man is a subject.

    • Lyn July 29, 2016, 7:31 pm

      Are you illiterate or do you just have a learning disability?
      There are browser tools for both spelling and grammar if you would like to at least pretend you know what you are talking about.

      Criminals will always have access. Germany has some of the most stringent gun control laws in the world and they recently raided a Mosque with thousands of firearms in their possession.

    • Tom Horn July 29, 2016, 8:05 pm

      Angel, just to take you seriously, and hopefully educate you. Citizens need semi-auto rifles for the same reason military and law enforcement need machine guns/semi-auto, high capacity rifles. They allow the defender to lay down suppressive/cover fire, so that loved-ones can get to safety, quick/accurate follow-up shots, so an attack can be repulsed. Just as you have many tools in your garage, not just a pair of pliers, so it is with firearms, you must have the right tool for the job. Using your logic, why didn’t we send soldiers into battle in WWII with just a 1911?

      Sure, I want to avoid the wrong folks from having dangerous weapons. We have laws in place. But judges in places like, Chicago do not enforce the current laws, and put dangerous firearms law violators back on the street, like a revolving door. Evil does not need firearms to create evil. 9/11/2001 (3000 deaths) was committed with box cutters. But firearms are definitely handy in ending evil.

      Look at places like Mexico, with strict firearms laws (citizens cannot legally own a firearm capable of firing a military round). The violence TO CITIZENS there is legendary. I hope you will rethink your position on the issue.

      • Richard Sokoloff July 30, 2016, 12:59 pm

        Tom is right. Why not go further. When the constitution was written the military arm was the Brown Bess muzzleloader riffle. Should all military now only use the Brown Bess. I think that all Americans should be trained in firearm use. The politicians should not be allowed to have more arms. All bodyguards should not be allowed to use firearms. If they want firearms, they and their guards must take the legal training to use the weapons and to carry them. I think that is only fair. The constitution as written in 1787 was not acceptable to James Madison’s Virginia Legislature. He was told to add the Declaration of Independence to the constitution if he wanted the 13 states to vote on it. This means the preamble and the Seven articles of the constitution were not important. Madison got John Adams and a signer from New York to summarize the Declaration into the Bill of Rights. That is the real Constitution. So far our leaders have managed to try and destroy the 1st, 2nd and 4th amendments. All of those people should resign for violating their oath of office.

    • John July 29, 2016, 11:20 pm

      Angel Gonna break it to you, politicians LIE!z
      Do I need a machine gun at home? So what will citizens do when they have another “Battle of Athens”, (when WWI vets rebelled against their corrupt government).
      Do you remember the Birmingham riot of 1963? Or 1965 Watts Riots? Or the 1992 LA riots, or more recently the Hurricane Katrina looting & killing.
      How many times has our National Guard been called out to kill their own citizens?
      Maybe you don’t think anyone needs a modern weapon any more, but please don’t speak for me….maybe you think our Government could never turn on us…it could never happen in America….BUT IT ALREADY HAS!

    • Beachhawk July 30, 2016, 11:51 am

      Angel, before you make a complete fool of yourself again, I suggest you improve your English skills, find out what the gun laws actually are in this country, read the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, keep up better with current events, and learn the history of gun control laws. I’ll leave it to other people to point out the many factual errors in your post and obvious ignorance of government and Federal law.

    • Kevin K. July 30, 2016, 7:41 pm

      The sole reason for the 2nd Amendment is to keep the government in check and the individual American safe and free. Remove guns and the government will no longer be controlled by the people. The government will control the people.
      The last seven years under this corrupt administration has been nothing but a WAR on the American people who stand by the Constitution. Obama and the DNC’s goal is to implement a gun registry for all legal gun owners, that’s what gun control laws are all about.
      Let’s examine history when other countries did the same, these are undisputed proven facts:
      1. In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
      2. In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
      3. Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
      4. China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated
      5. Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
      6. Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
      7. Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
      Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
      Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. This is just more proof the DNC has become the NAZI/COMMUNIST PARTY of this century and that is a PROVEN FACT!!! Examine the DNC’s TACTICS for the last 30 years and that will tell you they are exactly the SAME!! History always repeats itself!

  • Tommy Barrios July 29, 2016, 11:49 am

    The FACT that Billary Klinton has gotten anywhere near government is SOLID PROOF the system IS CORRUPT!
    The OBOMINATION should have been the SCREAMING SIGNAL that the SYSTEM IS CORRUPT but MORON MEDIA indoctrinated SHEEP just keep on VOTING DEMONCRAT!
    Here is a Video Trailer of Hillary’s America that is a further expose of the LIES and CORRUPTION of the Clintons and the Demoncrat Party!
    https://youtu.be/7LYRUOd_QoM
    We are on the path to being a turd world shite hole like most of Europe!

  • Mark McLean July 29, 2016, 11:16 am

    The Dems are for gun control so they can even the field because a lot of them cannot pass a background check. Also if you can’t defend yourself they can make you do what they want and tax you as much as they want.

  • OD July 29, 2016, 10:50 am

    All government, no matter the title is to be watched. Neither side wants an armed republic. To me, the 2nd amendment is not about hunting or self defense, but to maintain arms to rise against the tyranny of government. Maybe we should exercise that. Of course, we who rise up would most-likely be crushed, by those very brave men and women we support as police or military. Unless the government pays those private contract armies to do the job since the Americans in service may not be trusted with the task. The rise of a more socialistic government in the 30’s and the GCA of 1934 are a clue to governmental fear of an armed citizenry.

    • Tommy Barrios July 29, 2016, 11:54 am

      The F-ing GCA like ALL gun control laws is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and I don’t give a damn WHAT a bunch of LIBERAL LAWYERS misusing and abusing the courts think about same all the way up to and including the Supreme Court!
      THEY ARE ALL WRONG!

  • Jay July 29, 2016, 10:38 am

    In case no one has noticed the 2nd amendment is the most infringed upon human right there is, it has absolutely nothing to do with the empty rhetoric of safety but control of the masses! I can remember when we actually had freedoms, I could hang a rifle in the back window of my truck, drive around, go to school any where I pleased, no one called the law, or even got upset, no mass shootings because someone did, but today you would be crucified if you did so! I would rather live free with a certain degree of danger, than to be enslaved to the government like so many are today and can’t even see it!

    • Super B July 29, 2016, 10:46 am

      Not only could it be in your gun rack in your school parking lot, but you could leave your truck unlocked and the windows down. No one would take it. No one would mess with it.

    • Tommy Barrios July 29, 2016, 11:59 am

      The Communist Progressive Liberal controlled Educational System and MORON MEDIA brainwashed and indoctrinated SHEEP keep on VOTING DEMONCRAT!
      As long as that keeps going on, you will have more of the same!

    • Frank July 29, 2016, 12:02 pm

      We had freedoms in those days because people followed rules, reasonable rules.
      We could take jackknives to school, shotgun or 22 in the trunk to hunt and trap before and after, but we didn’t kill anyone to make a statement and be on TV for 15 minutes of fame (or infamy).
      Unfortunately, these days everyone thinks they can make up the own rules and pick and choose which laws they want to follow and which ones they don’t.
      That’s really the definition of the breakdown of civilization.
      Lunatics and criminals don’t have 2nd Amendment rights in my book.
      As long as they can be armed, we have a huge problem.

  • Tim July 29, 2016, 10:31 am

    History tells the tale. How many millions of people have been murdered by there own government? After the communist takeover in Russian, the nazi take over in Germany gun control was a top priority. Both groups left wing both racist. And it did not stop there. There were many others that followed. It is still going on in Africa today. The government wants control the second amendment stands in there way.

  • Pat Bryan July 29, 2016, 10:17 am

    I am unable to find any factual support for your statement “Everywhere that has implemented strict gun control spirals out off the scale with crime.”
    If you want to come up with some incredibly stupid statement like “Well, it just naturally follows that criminals are going to take advantage of folks who cannot protect themselves, then you are lying, and you think that we are stupid.
    If you wish to participate in the debate, instead of throwing invective from the sideline, you must be armed with actual, real, verifiable Facts, statistics, and science. The NRA even lies about opinion polls of its own members. It is no wonder that the country’s largest gun club is getting marginalized as an extremist propaganda outfit and politician corrupter.
    There is a political debate. Guns in America is the topic. You may participate, and affect the outcome, if you stick to the truth. If you want to rant lies and propaganda, please step this way to the 1st Amendment Cage.

    • Paul Helinski July 29, 2016, 10:23 am

      Look in Amazon for John Lott. You are probably just a paid troll, but hey, that’s the world we live in today.

    • denno July 29, 2016, 11:00 am

      Chicago, Newark nj, Detroit, Camden,LA……….

    • Flyboyron July 29, 2016, 11:58 am

      Typical Liberal Bullshit.
      You don’t get to decide what the “debate” is, you smug, self-important a-hole. And that’s part of why we NEED and WILL PROTECT the 2nd Amendment. So idiots like you can’t usher us into ANY cage just for exercising the rights we have had since long before this country even started. We just finally have created a government that is SUPPOSED to protect them.
      What city with strict gun control (I.e. unilateral disarmament of law-abiding citizens) has had a decrease in gun crime attributable to that gun control? Chicago? Baltimore? Washington, D.C..?
      Give me a break. No thinking person can make that argument any longer. There are just too many obvious examples that it’s bullshit.

    • Tommy Barrios July 29, 2016, 12:03 pm

      If you want LIES and propaganda, please step this way to the Communist Progressive Liberal LOON cage where this MORON Pat Bryan resides!

    • Kenneth Boyd July 29, 2016, 3:19 pm

      “You must be armed with actual, real, verifiable facts” followed by “the NRA even lies about opinion polls of it’s own members” shows that you, Pat Bryan, can “come up with some incredibly stupid statement.” The NRA is not a gun club and it’s membership is increasing, not decreasing.

    • Tom Horn July 29, 2016, 8:52 pm
    • Beachhawk July 30, 2016, 12:07 pm

      Actually, the cities with the strictest gun controls are the very cities with the highest rate of gun crime and murder. Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, Los Angeles, and Detroit for examples. Florida has the third largest population in the United States. We have a very low crime rate for our population and yet more than 1.5 million Floridians have concealed weapons licenses. Other states with gun-friendly laws also have low rates of violent crime. I think you must be trying to quote Democrat Party talking points. If the NRA was caught lying about anything, the press and Congressional Democrats would be all over it. The fact that that hasn’t happened should tell you something. I suggest you stop being condescending and get your facts straight before you post on a firearms forum. We gun owners tend to better informed than the Democrats would have you believe.

  • Mike July 29, 2016, 7:10 am

    Just look at New York State’s Safe Act. Tell me she won’t take away guns!!! She wants to follow in lock step with New York. A state that makes you wait 5 years before allowing you to apply for a Conceal Carry Permit. A state that requires ammo sales to be recorded by every vendor. A state that limits mag capacity. That defines assault weapons as anything that looks too dangerous, (note the words below, “military-style weapons”. Isn’t any weapon a “military-style weapon”??? Where does that begin and end? Is it Clinton that’ll make that decision??? Just reading the Law in New York State requires a set of lawyers for interpretation. And here at hillaryclinton.com (under the heading ISSUES, this is where she talks about solutions to problems) you’ll find campaign slogans that don’t define her true position or the efforts she’ll under take to change the 2nd Amendment.

    From Clinton’s campaign web site;

    “As president, Hillary will:
    Expand background checks to more gun sales—including by closing the gun show and internet sales loopholes—and strengthen the background check system by getting rid of the so-called “Charleston Loophole.”
    Take on the gun lobby by removing the industry’s sweeping legal protection for illegal and irresponsible actions (which makes it almost impossible for people to hold them accountable), and revoking licenses from dealers who break the law.
    Keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers, other violent criminals, and the severely mentally ill by supporting laws that stop domestic abusers from buying and owning guns, making it a federal crime for someone to intentionally buy a gun for a person prohibited from owning one, and closing the loopholes that allow people suffering from severe mental illness to purchase and own guns. She will also support work to keep military-style weapons off our streets.”

  • Harland July 29, 2016, 5:39 am

    Your perspective might bare weight if it had not been for the fact that the first thing the Republicans did was to ban all guns from not just the convention floor but from the grounds of the convention as well

    • Richard July 29, 2016, 8:30 am

      Sorry to disabuse you of your notion Harlan but Cleveland gun laws are strict. The Ohio Gun Collectors moved their meetings from Cleveland to Cincinnati because of them. That is the reason there were no guns allowed at the convention. Nice try but no cigar.

      • joe July 29, 2016, 9:12 am

        Please, don’t act like Republicans aren’t anti-gun – they’re just not as anti-gun as Dems. They’re two halves of the same establishment party, and neither gives a crap about you.

        Notice we’re still suffering under the NFA, GCA, ’89 Executive Order ban (under a Republican) and a multitude of other unconstitutional laws despite years of total Republican control.

  • Joe July 29, 2016, 5:25 am

    This will be the death knell of the republic for which we once stood if you turn a blind eye to what the party of socialism has planned for you and the ever increasing national debt.
    A debt that is meaningless UNLESS you are planning on the entitlements and / or 401 K’s for your senior years.
    When the economy tanks so does all those retirement funds, or have you not been paying attention to what has been going on for the last forty years.
    Save the last bullet in your gun boys and girls….

  • Vance Frickey July 29, 2016, 3:53 am

    Wondering about this myself. Blaming the Russians for the wikileaks dump of those DNC Emails would have not just been called “McCarthyism,” if Trump had done that to try and explain away some of his issues, the press would have laughed and laughed and everyone else would have jumped on the bandwagon.

    Yet there’s compelling evidence that Hillary Clinton was at least indirectly on the Russian payroll (in the UraniumOne deal) and no one – and I do mean NO ONE – is pushing this narrative, The intelligence community is briefing Trump and Clinton soon, and the issue ought to be, “who’s the proven Russian agent of influence” – clueless Donald or Hillary who apologized because Bush finally woke up in 2008 and started turning the screws on the Russians, then futzed around until those same bastards invaded the Crimea and Eastern Ukraine (and arguably took money to keep Nigerian ISIS affiliate Boko Haram from being listed officially as a terrorist organization).

    I give up on the GOP, and on “gentlemanly campaigns.” It’s time for a conservative party which actually desires to win Presidential elections emough to hang Democratic skidmark laundry out on the line for everyone to see.

  • Frank July 29, 2016, 3:14 am

    To be fair, the RNC didn’t want people carrying weapons either.
    At least the DNC stuck to their “guns” when it comes to no weapons.
    It’s pretty sad when even the party that DOES like the 2nd amendment refuses to let the public exercise it at their party 😛

  • Tom Horn July 28, 2016, 5:15 pm

    Welcome to the New World Order. It’s all about the $, and control. Great Video.

    Imagine for a minute that you are a philanthropist millionaire/billionaire. You are Bill & Hillary, the Obama’s (just purchased $7 million mansion), or ex-NYC mayor, Michael Scumberg. You want to make America a safer place for its’ Citizens, and especially the children. Do you?:

    A. Try to pass laws to restrict American Citizens’ 2nd Amendment Rights.
    or,
    B. Donate money to start a National School Guard Program to screen, hire, arm, and train National School Guards to protect our children while in school. Donate $ to train civilian and teachers the best ways to defend against attacks. Urge your Federal Government to start a National Civil Defense Program, like the one implemented in the U.S. during WWII.

    Don’t be fooled by the rhetoric. Their true goals are revealed in their actions. Or, reserve your spot in the cage, today.

    • Tom Horn July 28, 2016, 6:51 pm

      P.S.

      Why were the deeds of the Clinton Foundation not brought up at the Republican National Convention? They have brought up every time Donald Trump stiffed a shoe-shine boy on a tip, at the Democratic National Convention. This could sway a lot of voters. They have dropped the ball on this one.

      • Paul Helinski July 28, 2016, 6:56 pm

        Because they are all on the same side, and it isn’t our side.

        • Frank July 29, 2016, 12:12 pm

          That is 100% right, Tom.
          The real Big Money Boys don’t want you armed either, nor will they be grateful you voted right. They just don’t care.
          All they want is all you have.

      • kari July 29, 2016, 8:28 am

        It would have been smart to put a website URL on the screen behind all the speakers for people to go and see the movie. They probably wouldn’t have even had to say a word about the URL. People would go anyway out of curiosity.

Leave a Comment

Send this to a friend