Do You Support the Time-Traveling Technology that Makes Us More Safe, Less Free?

As I mentioned in the past, I’m a big fan of the podcast Radiolab. Recently, they ran a story called “Eye in the Sky” that got me to think quite differently about government surveillance. But I’ll get to the podcast in a moment as I want to start out with a no-brainer, that it’s no secret that the government watches us, tracks us and, in some cases, spies on us. Yet to the degree that it does, and to the degree that we allow it to is something that I don’t think many of us often contemplate.

Even after the Edward Snowden disclosures the outrage about extraconstitutional government intrusion into the private lives of its citizens was short-lived and somewhat muted. We were apathetic when we should have been irate. We should have demanded change. But we didn’t. Instead, the powers that be paid us some lip-service about increasing transparency and holding the NSA, CIA, FBI, DHS, etc., accountable for their actions. Of course, none of that happened.

What we got instead were some trivial adjustments to the “Patriot Act,” recently, that in no way change, reduce or curtail the government’s ability to spy on us. Congress had the nerve — in true Orwellian fashion — to call those adjustments the “USA Freedom Act,” as if we are somehow more free or better off following its enactment on June 2, 2015.

No we are not better off. Just like under the Patriot Act, under the USA Freedom Act the government will still be allowed to collect telecommunication metadata on all of us. The only real difference is that now the phone companies will hold on to the metadata instead of the NSA. But the NSA will still have all the access it wants to that data. And that’s the important point after all. It’s not about who holds onto the data, but who has access to it.

Another inconsequential change is that when the government requests data from phone companies, it will only be able to store it for eighteen months instead of the five years allotted under the Patriot Act. Of course, if the government decides you’re a person of interest, all bets are off. You’re on the watch list.

But even supposing for a moment that these changes would somehow make a difference, the truth is that there is no way to tell if the government is actually keeping its promise on them. That’s because we rely on an inept Congress and a secret FISA court that pretty much rubber stamps every surveillance request made by the NSA, FBI, CIA. Yes, the word “secret” is not an exaggeration, as all FISA’s hearings are closed to the public. To put it mildly, we’re screwed. And our essential liberties and freedoms have never been in more jeopardy than they are today.

It’s with that thought in mind that I circle back to the Radiolab podcast I recently listened to. Because, if you thought somehow things were going to get better in terms of government surveillance, you could’t be more wrong. Technology is constantly changing the game, making it easier for the government agents to monitor the lives of Americans, and there’s no way to put the genie back in the bottle. Here’s the blurb from the podcast (which I encourage you to listen to):

Ross McNutt has a superpower — he can zoom in on everyday life, then rewind and fast-forward to solve crimes in a shutter-flash. But should he?

In 2004, when casualties in Iraq were rising due to roadside bombs, Ross McNutt and his team came up with an idea. With a small plane and a 44 mega-pixel camera, they figured out how to watch an entire city all at once, all day long. Whenever a bomb detonated, they could zoom onto that spot and then, because this eye in the sky had been there all along, they could scroll back in time and see – literally see – who planted it. After the war, Ross McNutt retired from the airforce, and brought this technology back home with him. Manoush Zomorodi and Alex Goldmark from the podcast “Note to Self” give us the low-down on Ross’s unique brand of persistent surveillance, from Juarez, Mexico to Dayton, Ohio. Then, once we realize what we can do, we wonder whether we should.

It’s only a matter of time before wide swaths of the public begin supporting the idea of constant government drone surveillance on U.S. soil (I could see certain Democratic politicians pushing it right now, e.g. Hillary). The pitch of a “safer” albeit more closely monitored society is hard to resist, especially to those who don’t believe they are responsible for their own safety — which I’m afraid to admit is the prevailing mindset in this country (only 1 in 3 of us own firearms).  So, if you ask me, it won’t be long before we are all living under and eye in the sky.   The question is what happens then? What happens to those of us who exercise our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms? What happens to those of us who are critical of the government?

About the author: S.H. Blannelberry is the News Editor of GunsAmerica.

{ 3 comments… add one }
  • Mahatma Muhjesbude August 18, 2017, 7:39 am

    Good important article. Totalitarianism is a slow, but powerful process. It actually began at the turn of the century in America. And now the only way to reverse it is through hard skidding and braking as fast as possible, before our liberties are simply irretrievable anymore. Something that’s almost impossible for egalitarian patrdiots to accomplish with the division in the country that you pointed out. Apparantly we just don’t have enough liberty minded Billionaires to help, compared to the tyrannical leftists.

    The ‘persistent surveillance’ is growing exponentially as we complain, uselessly, about it. Once the unconstitutional ‘national biometric I.D. cards are universally in place (2005 Real I.D Act)z by next year, the police will have special scanners for them to check more ‘deeply’ into your privacy/identity, for better crime prevention ‘profiling’ and all new cars are required to have ‘special’ computers by 2020 with special gps, and ‘backscatting’ vehicles will be running through our streets scanning/ searching passing vehicles on routes as regular as bus lines. Maybe they’ll even be installed on busses!

    License plate readers are already installed on municipal vehicles. At the prepper con in Utah this year we noticed one on a ‘public’ vehicle. But these are already obsolete compared to the new ‘Patriot Radar scanners/cameras (a stock company)now being installed everywhere which can essentially do the same thing your airport TSA body scanner does, only this device can scan an entire Kiosk area at your local super mall, or an entire busy street, etc. etc. They’ll be interfaced in virtually all major cities by 2020 with the successful ‘shot spotter’ technology in street lights and other Omni-directional view locations with the intent to immediately locate any armed attempt at citizen resistance should it ever come down to that against heavy government tyranny. small, but ‘serious’ drones would then be instantly strategically dispatched to ‘neutralize’ the shooters, while dedicated task forces of police respond. And of course, this is why they REALLY don’t want silencers to be legal without background checks and paperwork.

    So there’s your future. Have fun, get high, but don’t EVER think you, the stupid fucking people, are ever going to tell THIS Deep State government what to do.

    So H.R. , my friend, to answer your last question as to ‘what happens to those of us who criticize the ‘government’?
    Well, you probably know the answer to that already. It’s happening already. Has been for decades.

    You can always make it more difficult for them by not doing any jogging on public streets, or establishing a pattern of eating anywhere with any ‘regularity’. And don’t be walking around anywhere where a stranger can quickly come up and ‘Rob’ you by killing you and not even taking your money or wallet like they did the DNC potential WikiLeaks whistleblower recently. Maybe then at least you’ll be able to do them some damage in any attempt, But, of course, if ‘accidents’ don’t work out, there’s always a ‘new technique’ they are ‘dying to try, like ones they recently used in Cuba to make all the embassy staff so sick they had to shut it down and bring them back to the U.S. Once they perfect this device they’ll be able to aim it at distance from a van at you walking down the street and burst a little vein in your brain for a nice terminal stroke listed on your DC as ‘death from natural causes’ .
    Political assassinations are not a lost art. They are actually the most expedient and cost effective of all ‘solutions’ And they are happening all the time. Even the Vatican dabbles hitherto from time to time.
    But don’t worry about it too much. Just being a professional critic wouldn’t put you or me on a serious government shit list otherwise a large percentage of the pop would have to be capped. They’re after ‘movement’ leaders first who actually amass a physical following and are down and dirty proacdtive in the streets and can likely gain support momentum for direct tactical confrontations.
    That’s why they quickly took out Finicum at the Malheur Refuge debacle. It’s called the ‘decap tactic’.

    Talk or ‘evangelical’ prose is cheap. Not many really listen to the message. Nobody really gives a shit anymore, unless it’s up in your face with a club.

  • Will Drider July 14, 2015, 12:21 am

    Great info piece. If you don’t listen to the radio link, you will not get the full impact of this. Time to buy stock in companies that make blimps. They can stay airborne much longer then planes.

  • Tony Bradley July 12, 2015, 2:11 pm

    The good thing is that persistent surveillance has not come close to living up to the developer’s promise. The bad thing is that they keep trying.

Leave a Comment

Send this to a friend