Kamala Harris Vows Executive Action to Force Universal Background Checks

Democratic Presidential candidate Kamala Harris will give Congress 100 days to enact her anti-gun agenda before she takes executive actions. (Photo: Kamala Harris Facebook)

Democratic presidential hopeful Kamala Harris told a crowd at a CNN town hall on Monday that, if elected, she plans to use executive action to implement near-universal background checks, revoke the licenses of firearms dealers who break the law, close the so-called “boyfriend loophole,” and prohibit people with arrest warrants from buying guns.

“There are people in Washington, D.C., supposed leaders, who have failed to have the courage to reject a false choice which suggests you’re either in favor of the Second Amendment or you want to take everyone’s guns away,” Harris said.

“Upon being elected, I will give the United States Congress 100 days to get their act together and have the courage to pass reasonable gun safety laws, and if they fail to do it, then I will take executive action.”

Harris’s campaign also expressed support for banning “assault weapons” and “high capacity” magazines, making gun trafficking a federal crime, and outlawing those convicted of a federal hate crime from buying guns.

Harris’s background check policy is among her most detailed to date. She wants to use her executive powers to force anyone who sells more than five firearms per year to conduct background checks on all future gun sales.

SEE ALSO: Kamala Harris Wants Congressmen in a ‘Locked Room’ with ‘Autopsy Photographs’ of Children Killed in Sandy Hook

“Millions of guns are sold each year with no questions asked in the 30 states without universal background checks,” according to a copy of Harris’s proposal. “This is how dangerous people buy guns: about 80% of all firearms acquired for criminal purposes are bought through unlicensed sellers.”

The move would severely restrict private gun sales and force private citizens to purchase costly Federal Firearms Licenses in order to conduct the requisite background checks through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.

Harris’s plan also promises to take executive action against firearms manufacturers and dealers that break the law. She claims that the Protection of Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) “prevents victims of gun violence from holding law-breaking gun manufacturers and dealers accountable,” and she vows to act if Congress does not repeal the PLCAA within the first 100 days of her presidency.

SEE ALSO: Their Own Worst Enemy: Leftist Disarmament Agenda Concentrates Guns in Hands of ‘Tyrannical’ Trump

The PLCAA is often targeted by anti-gun politicians, but the facts don’t back up Harris’s claims. The PLCAA doesn’t protect members of the gun industry from product liability suits for manufacturing or design defects, or certain types of negligent conduct. It merely prohibits lawsuits against gun makers for damages resulting from the third-party criminal misuse of their firearms.

This isn’t the first time Harris has used a CNN town hall to make incendiary anti-gun comments. At another event in January, she said that congresspeople should be forced to look at images of the children killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre.

“I think somebody should have required all those members of Congress to go in a room, in a locked room, no press, no one, nobody else, and look at the autopsy photographs of those babies,” Harris said at the time. “And then you can vote your conscience. This has become a political issue.”

Harris consistently ranks third in national polling behind Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden. But while Biden and Sanders consistently garner over 20 percent of the vote, Harris has yet to break double digits.

***Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! All Local Sales are FREE!***

About the author: Jordan Michaels has been reviewing firearm-related products for over four years and enjoying them for much longer. With family in Canada, he’s seen first hand how quickly the right to self-defense can be stripped from law-abiding citizens. He escaped that statist paradise at a young age, married a sixth-generation Texan, and currently lives in Waco. Follow him on Instagram @bornforgoodluck and email him at jordan@gunsamerica.com.

{ 90 comments… add one }
  • Lee Totman October 12, 2020, 10:43 am

    Hey Kamala,

    How about enforcing the laws that are already in place.

  • CharlieKing1 May 9, 2019, 4:27 pm

    Isn’t what she’s threatening to do is already against the law? Please tell me what 30 states allow people to buy firearms with no questions asked? What the hell is a 4473? Seems to me that there are a whole bunch of questions asked on that form…this woman is a clown.

  • Leo May 6, 2019, 12:39 pm

    She should not worry, no body will vote for her anyway…

  • Tom April 28, 2019, 12:15 pm

    These types of dictatorial actions are EXACTLY why the 2d Amendment exists — to prevent the Gov from dictating to WE THE PEOPLE what, when, how and where we’ll buy. The “anti American libs” (AAL’s) need to remember that.

  • john sabin April 27, 2019, 11:46 pm

    Kamala Harris :: admitted pot smoker and gun owner. Barak Obama stated YOU CAN’T HAVE BOTH. FELONY!!
    is anyone getting it yet??

  • Richard April 27, 2019, 4:31 am

    She is a typical Dumacrat .all they want is Dictatorship!
    They hate the Constitution and everything it stands for.
    Why don’t they all leave and go to a Communist country!!

  • David Welsh April 27, 2019, 1:17 am

    I’m not worried. No commie, loose morals politician can take away my rights.

    • woodrow tyler April 27, 2019, 2:49 pm

      i agree with u richard. they just want to run the country and take away all our rights to own and bare arms. i served in the military for 20 years and also desert storm vet. i dont go along with any democrat. they justr want to ruin our country . if they go int office in 2020 this country will go down the tubes and be athird world like some of the rest.

    • Ron Orban May 2, 2019, 11:31 am

      Yes they can David. Tjey\’ve been doing it for decades because we haven\”t chopped people like Kamala up for Lobster Bait as we should.

  • John April 26, 2019, 8:33 pm

    Bedfellows make strange politicians!

  • Rich Collins April 26, 2019, 8:33 pm

    Just another politician that wants to disarm law abiding citizens to make them helpless to the actions of violent criminals. Any bets she won’t have her protective details disarmed? Why have armed police if the ordinary citizen cannot be trusted to be armed?

    Radical loons like the pole dancer should be confined in rubber rooms.

    • B April 26, 2019, 1:42 pm

      And she won’t turn in her own personally owned firearm she carries for “protection” or revoke her CCW that she authorized for herself as Attorney General of Kalifornia, either.

  • Stuart April 26, 2019, 7:36 pm

    Fortunately, we don’t have to be at all concerned that this hoe will ever be elected to the White House. Consequently, she can grandstand about whatever she dam well wants to.

  • Alfonso Alfredo Rodriguez April 26, 2019, 7:12 pm

    There are laws in the books addressing these problems. What she must do is to hold accountable those who break it instead of enacting another series of misguided “executive actions”. As usual, she thinks that voters are stupid and treats them as such. Ms Harris has a well documented history of legal overreaching and abuse in California and left that state in worse condition than when she was a state public servant.

    • Darreld April 27, 2019, 12:14 am

      This is what come of letting foreigners get elected to Congress. Harris is a foreigner as neither of her parents were citizens at the time of her birth so she is either Indian or Jamaican, not American. She clearly doesn’t know the Constitution nor the powers granted to the separate branches of government under the Constitution. She can’t legally or Constitutionally run for President first of all, and she can’t issue EO’s that violate the Constitution.

    • Patrick Hank April 27, 2019, 12:19 am

      We need to start holding all public servants accountable. They are our employees not our Sovereigns. Any politician than even threatens to restrict our human, civil and especially Constitutional rights need to be prosecuted for depriving us of rights and them violating their oath. WWG1WGA

  • Greg April 26, 2019, 5:54 pm

    Spin spin spin spin spin spin…

    For starters “30 other states that do not require background checks?? There are only 9 states with full universal background check laws, and 2 more for handguns only.

    Second, who has heard of the”boyfriend” loophole, and how does she expect to close something that would be illegal under current laws? (straw purchaser)

    Third, If you are convicted of a federal “hate crime” you are already a convicted criminal (unless there are federal misdemeanors) and therfore not eligible to purchase a firearm.

    Fourth, the whole “assault weapon” definition

    Fifth, the whole “Large vs. standard capacity magazine” definition, that was recently overturned in California with a well written judicial ruling.

    She gets to say anything she wants, she’s at the bottom of the polls.

    • Kenneth America April 27, 2019, 8:47 am

      The “boyfriend loophole” is NOT the same as a “straw purchase”.

      This “boyfriend loophole” allows the purchase of a firearm by someone charged with domestic violence if he is not married to the victim; i.e., if he is a boyfriend rather than a spouse.

      • Jon B April 29, 2019, 7:13 am

        If you are convicted of domestic violence you are prohibited from purchasing a firearm. This has nothing to do with whether you are married or not. I believe she may be referring to a spouse or bf/gf buying a gun for a partner who is a felon or prohibited person.

      • Fern LeMay April 29, 2019, 5:16 pm

        Domestic violence charges prohibit the ownership of firearms. Doesn’t matter who it involved

    • Johnny K April 28, 2019, 11:53 pm

      This is the reason she it the bottom of the polls, she is grasping at straws

  • blg April 26, 2019, 5:49 pm

    She’s a typical democrat . A commie loving, America hating liberal! Control is all the democrats want, and you can’t control an armed society.

  • Jamie April 26, 2019, 3:19 pm

    Clearly another politician who has no idea what she’s saying or what laws already exist.

    So she wants to make straw purchases illegal and make it illegal for fugitives from justice prohibited from purchasing firearms. Hmmm…

    • perlcat April 26, 2019, 11:21 am

      She knows exactly what she is saying; she’s an intelligent person who spent a lot of time with criminals and knows the overwhelming majority of them get their weapons illegally. That’s not the problem. She just *doesn’t care* that this is wrong and will do nothing, because people are stupid enough to believe it and vote for her.

    • Kenneth America April 26, 2019, 12:53 pm

      I know it is stupid beyond belief but since February 2017, the ATF definition of “fugitive from justice” ONLY includes persons wanted for prosecution who have CROSSED STATE LINES!

      All the half-million names of formerly forbidden fugitives were purged from the FBI database, Only those KNOWN to have crossed a state line are now flagged in the NCIS background check.

      I think murderers, armed robbers, felony drug dealers, rapists and other violent offenders should be on the blocked list even if they stay within the state where the offense occurred.

      Don’t you agree that this is just common sense?

    • Stuart April 26, 2019, 7:40 pm

      She wants to make illegal acts doubly illegal. That’s definitely going to work much more effectively, doubly effectively!

  • Andrew April 26, 2019, 2:40 pm

    Curious if she thinks congress members should also have to look at pictures of aborted babies. Prob not.

  • Rich April 26, 2019, 12:53 pm

    Don’t be too dismissive of this women. One she is dangerous. Two the front running crazies in the Democrat party are well into or beyond what might normally be described as “golden years” as in they could expire due to advanced age. T-H-R-E-E There is talk of putting a woman on their ticket as vice-president. In a next to worst case scenario she could be that woman. If they won she would be a cardiac blip away from the presidency! And THAT would be the worst nightmare for not only our country but the entire planet.

  • Charles Moore April 26, 2019, 11:39 am

    Chlamydia Harris thinks that criminals will be doing background checks when selling to other criminals??? There’s been a “boyfriend loophole” created now? Come on, Kamaltoe; name ONE of the manufacturers or dealers you people have tried to sue into oblivion that acted “illegally.” They simply acted in a manner that you rabid socialists did not like – they made or sold a gun. As a former California AG, you clearly were unqualified for the job. Getting to the top the way you did is not a qualification for higher office, but it is a requirement for participation in “the worlds oldest profession.”

  • Sean April 26, 2019, 11:12 am

    Lock her in a room make her look at picture of Mr Hitler and all he was able to accomplish with gun control.

  • Joseph Gokey April 26, 2019, 10:50 am

    I am totally confused as to ,,, why the public tolerates all this BS from congressional A-HOLES and get so upset as to their comments. All they want is attention/. Most cow paddies lie in the field and are picked up and burned when the need for fire starters.

  • Russ April 26, 2019, 10:29 am

    Nothing but a cheap Whore.

  • Poggy April 26, 2019, 10:16 am

    I believe she has state she carries…

    I wonder if she is in violation of CA & DC law,
    OR
    the states she travels through when carrying
    OR
    Homeland Security when flying?

    • b April 26, 2019, 8:55 pm

      Nope she is “legal” as she authorized herself to have a CCW as Attorney General of Kalifornia. And as the so-called “top cop” now “retired” from that position she is covered under the LEOSA of 1984. You and the rest of the “subjects” however are screwed…

  • Poggy April 26, 2019, 10:09 am

    Hey, Kimmee, go home, you just removed your dub a$$ from any votes you might have gotten.

  • KimberproSS April 26, 2019, 9:48 am

    I pizzes me off when I hear gun grabbers make the uninformed statements on guns because their uninformed base believes them. Either she is uninformed or an outright liar. Either way she isn’t viable presidential material. They make an oath the protect and support the constitution when they take office and she is outright saying she won’t.

    • Charles Moore April 26, 2019, 11:43 am

      My vote is “outright liar.”

  • The Equalizer April 26, 2019, 9:29 am

    Yawn… More predictable pablum from a DemoRat that will never happen….

  • Sheepdog April 26, 2019, 9:25 am

    It’s time we all stand up and stop this shit. We are so close to losing our country to a bunch of manipulative scum bags. They want to Take our guns, not punish criminals, give free everything for people who dont work, while we pay for it. We cannot give them 1 inch of anything!!! I’m so sick of the double standard.

  • vinnie April 26, 2019, 9:17 am

    She wants the convicted Drug dealers to “Control “the Legal Marijuana Market because they already have “First Hand Experience “in dealing drugs So wouldn’t it be logical to have Murderers and convicted Felons jailed for committing Crimes while armed to control Guns since they have “First Hand” knowledge

  • John P Robertson April 26, 2019, 9:08 am

    The possibility of some sort of alien law, british, australian, islamic, or whatever, getting imposed on the United States is pretty remote. The most immediate threat to our civil right of self defense, rather, is california law getting imposed on the whole country. More than anyone else, ex attorney general harris embodies that threat. After all, she presided over it for 8 years.

  • Ed Mosbey April 26, 2019, 9:01 am

    She needs to be forced to look at pictures of people Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and others have killed.

  • Bob Ramirez April 26, 2019, 8:54 am

    I don’t believe Kamala Harris is qualified to be President!

    • Charles Moore April 26, 2019, 11:47 am

      She is/was an “anchor baby.” NOT legally qualified.

  • MB April 26, 2019, 8:52 am

    She got to her DA job by being a shank “girlfriend” to old geezer Willie Brown 20 years ago, Does she plan on giving everybody in the country a “Lewinsky” to get to be president?

  • Kevin Meyer April 26, 2019, 8:51 am

    Infidelity with Senior legislators early in her political career was her choice to “Move Up”. Selfish People are Never to be Trusted!

  • DAN III April 26, 2019, 8:46 am

    Why care what Harris thinks about American citizens rights to self-defense ? Just for once I would like one of these essay-posting imbeciles to address the fact that Kamala Harris is Constitutionally ineligible to be POTUS ! She IS NOT a natural born CITIZEN. She is the product of both her parents being foreigners when she was birthed. She is simply an anchor baby.

    Like soetoro-obama before her, the PTB, the courts AND the ignorant citizens of fUSA will allow the scoundrel Harris to sit behind the Resolute desk in the Oval Office.

    The Constitution is dead. As is this former nation without borders.

    • Charles Moore April 26, 2019, 11:51 am

      Doesn’t stop it from happening. The Kenyan was completely unqualified, too, but we had to gag from seeing and hearing him for 10+ years now and endure eight years of destruction to the country, the economy and race relations being shredded.

  • Marty Davis April 26, 2019, 8:43 am

    Interesting that this bitch thinks she could do what the Obama bitch couldn’t ….

  • Gerald Brickwood April 26, 2019, 8:36 am

    Constitutionally ignorant? Or simply willing to break the law and engage in illegal and unconstitutional acts? There is NO law that a President may amend, enact or repeal by Executive Order! Nor may a President overturn Supreme Court decisions or amend the Constitution by Executive Order. With this one statement she proves she’s unfit for the Presidency and taking her Oath of Office would be an act of perjury. It might even be possible that her oath as a Senator was false also.

    • Charles Moore April 26, 2019, 11:52 am

      The latter.

  • Ross E Mariano April 26, 2019, 8:32 am

    Maybe Ms Harris should purchase a gun and find out first hand the process involved in the purchase of guns. Every one I’ve purchased has required one. My advice to her is not to say anything about something she is clueless about. Better to be thought the fool than opening your mouth and proving it
    If she isn’t clueless it’s time to stop lying to the public

    • Kenneth America April 27, 2019, 8:51 am

      I don’t know if it is true but other commenters say that she has a license and carries.

  • Mike Warren April 26, 2019, 8:27 am

    Harris is an “anchor baby”; her parents are not US Citizens; she is not legally qualified for Presidential office. Send her packing.

    • John Izbrand April 26, 2019, 11:43 am

      There may be reasons she is not qualified to be president, but citizenship is NOT one of them. A person is a US citizen if they are born in this country or its possessions subject to US jurisdiction OR is born abroad if the parents were themselves American citizens at the time.

      Look, I despise these loonies as much as anyone else. But we should be correct in our facts so we don’t fall into the same category as them with their false “information”. How much of our effort would be wasted in arguing that she shouldn’t be eligible based on “anchor baby — not a citizen” only to find out in the end that anchor babies ARE US citizens?

  • Nobody April 26, 2019, 8:22 am

    Maybe she should be locked in a room and made to look at all the photos and autopsies of the innocent people killed by the gangs and drug dealers and then let them into her house with no guns and see what happens. This bullshit that is tearing this country apart from what it was founded on and so many brave people have fought and died for is a disgrace to the flag. Do they even understand what it took to make this country so great. And they want to take it all away. Wow. I don’t even want to see what it’ll be like for my grand kids and great grand kids to have to deal with. I am ashamed of what they are turning this country into

  • Rob April 26, 2019, 8:19 am

    We want officials in a locked room with the Autopsy report on Justice Scalia! Jamal’s Harris is a whore, an ex junkie, and should not be allowed to own a gun!

  • Jonathan Rude April 26, 2019, 8:12 am

    How about the babies being killed in abortion clinics everyday … far deadlier than any gun control measure would ever prevent?

  • BR549 April 26, 2019, 7:59 am

    So, Kamala “vows executive action to force universal background checks.” Would she also use executive action to force Congress members to release six years worth of their tax records before serving any term of office?

    Or would that basically wipe out her party?

  • Alan April 26, 2019, 7:50 am

    Set a precedent with the PLCAA and then we can sue liquor and vehicle manufacturers and sellers for damages caused by drunk drivers.

  • PB- dave April 26, 2019, 7:48 am

    Sadly the non-gunners have no clue that FFL dealers are punished for violations, and do have licenses revoke. And can be prosecuted for knowingly participating in “straw” buys. They also don’t have a clue of the amount of fed, state, and local gun laws already existing.

    Executive orders to circumvent the Constitution is dictatorship, plain and simple.

    Isn’t it funny she’d have congress locked in a room to look at dead people photos, but her party and their judges say requiring a person to look at an ultrasound of her baby before an abortion is illegal…..

  • Jim Eamons April 26, 2019, 7:32 am

    So apparently Ms. Harris is going to violate the oath of office, to protect and defend the constitution.
    Nobody seems to notice.

  • Rick April 26, 2019, 7:26 am

    We can only hope the KH and like minded ones start a hike accross the business end of a bombing range on a busy day….or any similar event.

  • Tim April 26, 2019, 7:12 am

    See you in court.
    I thought you were an attorney.
    Your obviously not a good one if you can’t understand our most important document.

  • Sean Carberry April 26, 2019, 7:03 am

    …if it gets to this there will be violence.

  • Jay April 26, 2019, 6:54 am

    It is simply astonishing of how many in government are totally stupid of our laws and they want to make more! Since 1998 we have had NICS back ground checks and form 4473 then on top of that many States have their own back ground check laws, gun transfer laws etc…! When we have a government who wants nothing more than to gain control over the citizens, it’s Time To Abolish and Replace that government, it is our right and duty to do so or we will be slaves! The government exist because We The People allow it to exist not that they allow us to have what they give us!

  • jack April 26, 2019, 6:37 am

    These “commie” leftist don’t give a hoot about gun control their end game is abolishing the 2nd amendment and having a wide open door for total gun confiscation aka, Hitler-Statin-Mao-and so on. Tell your kids, BE CAREFULL WHAT YOU WISH FOR when they’re preaching to them about all the FREE stuff they will be giving them if they vote their way.

  • Stephen Ryder April 26, 2019, 6:32 am

    Gun control is coming. You didn’t believe when the car came – you said “Get a horse.” The steam engine and the propeller plane are gone from military and commercial service. Women out number men and they now have the right to vote. African Americans are no longer slaves. Abortion and gay marriage are legal. Democrats rule congress. Trump is an insane, perverted, corrupt wanna-be dictator. Electric cars are here NOW and you can kiss goodbye to your Chrysler Hemi’s and Chevy small blocks. They stopped making Ford, Chevy and Cadillac sedans! In ten years – TEN years, Hispanics and African Americans will be the MAJORITY American population, and gun control will be here. Suck it up, ladies.

    • DELCO October 26, 2020, 9:05 am

      Stephen Ryder you are a giant mess. You say suck it up? You talk the way you do Stephen Ryder because you have never been in a position to make a difference. You obviously never served , you obviously never had to make the type of decisions that have consequences. Anti American dems like you Stephen Ryder who don’t stand up against disgusting frauds like Kamala Harris and joe Biden are the reason why real patriotic Americans have to even deal with this type of crap. Harris and Biden will say and do anything to keep the swamp flowing with their ideas. Try voting straight RED , if not our country will look more and more like California and NYC.

  • BigC April 26, 2019, 6:25 am

    This is just one of dozens of reasons this POS has NO CHANCE to be president!!!

  • The Original Brad April 26, 2019, 6:06 am

    It’s pretty obvious she’s teeing up another candidate. She’s taking one for the team (as she’s done before apparently) and making herself out to be the candidate that anyone right of far left can be identified with. All the wackjobs and noodle heads will follow her, and not the Chosen One, yet. Who is the Chosen One? I am not sure yet. Probably Joe Biden, but it doesn’t matter because when the final stretch hits and all the Kamala supporters have the rug pulled out from underneath them. They’ll be “given” their choice at the time. They are also testing the waters with her, seeing how much resistance she gets on the various outlandish BS she says. That way they can groom the chosen one’s policies to be as far left as can be, without alienating the mainstream voters.

  • Charles April 26, 2019, 6:06 am

    To Kuntmala Harris:

    MOLON LABE……

  • Gomer April 26, 2019, 5:51 am

    Good ol’ “hate crime enhancement.” Will she also advocate legislation making the false reporting of a “hate crime” a hate crime? Of course there is nullification via prosecutorial discretion, as recently witnessed in Chicago, so fat lot of good our laws do when unenforced.

  • John April 26, 2019, 5:37 am

    The funny thing about this whole article is the part about gun trafficking. It is already a federal law plus the biggest gun trafficking bunch of them all is the federal government themselves. She is just another nitwit who is just wasting her time and our money. Go back to work and do your job that you are paid to do, and that is represent your constituents.

  • Loc-n-Load April 26, 2019, 5:00 am

    Well I like to know when the revolution is going to start when are we going to take this country back, a friend of mine told me that an illegal Mexican back East somewhere collected $30,000 for income tax return, and my government that I actually fought for has the gall to tell me I owe them $25,000 I’d rather go to jail, as far as crime, My gal’s mother just got her bank account emptied out 34 hundred bucks she still in the hole, so I was wondering if the law enforcement when after these fried people that’s ripping people’s bank accounts off like the Democrats are going after the president there would be no bank fraud.
    he told me that he read somewhere that there is some kind of loophole in the law, and they’re not going to waste their time to fix it the next time you pay taxes think about where your money is going.

  • Boxer Primer April 26, 2019, 4:43 am

    It would be good to have her walk into the south side of Chicago with her entourage of armed defenders…… and broker a truce among the future 500 yearly dead caused by her sub-saharan-nubian troop of Democrat Party induced ghetto occupiers.

    THAT would be gun control. LOL ! >>>We’ll never ever see it !

  • GMan April 26, 2019, 4:42 am

    Good. The more moonbattery by these communists the better. When one of them comes up with some piece of proposed bizarro-world legislation the rest of the pack of lemmings seem to follow suit.

    You’ll see plenty of back-pedaling when the field gets narrowed and after the primary. Don’t let it happen, make them own it. Remind people by social media every chance you can. For now just let them dig deeper.

  • Lev Michaels April 26, 2019, 3:18 am

    WOW, what did I just read??? As a Retired Fed and active FFL… I am speechless.

    She wants to revoke licenses from FFLs who break the law? It’s been done for a long time.

    She wants to prohibit people with arrest warrants from buying guns? I thought in America one is innocent till proven guilty? Don’t even wait for Justice to prevail huh???

    Boyfriend loophole? Go for it… a dozen other politicians are waaaay ahead of her

    100 days for Congress to get their act together. I got one word, LMFAO.

    She wants to ban assault weapons, high cap magazines… AGAIN, go for it, dozens of your politburo friends are waaay ahead of you.

    She wants to make gun trafficking a federal crime? I think it’s already federal, unless she meant within one state’s borders?

    More than five weapon sales a year? ATF is already enforcing sales for profit or at least they are trying, but naaaaaa. Not working…

    Criminals buy their weapons from unlicensed sellers folks!!! Yup, she came up with that on her own!!!

    Well it’s kind of late, will leave this here.

    Lev

  • Randy Overly April 25, 2019, 9:07 pm

    NO THREAT, NO SWEAT, FLASH IN THE PAN!

  • Dan Gore April 25, 2019, 1:31 pm

    As another constitutionally ignorant wannabe presidential candidate. She doesn’t understand that she has no power to tell Congress to do her bidding, or “else”.This is how Fascism gets its start. Hitler, Mussolini, &the rest of the LEFTIST tyrannical Democrats, need to be stopped by any constitutional means that the American citizens have at their disposal.

    • Stephen Ryder April 26, 2019, 6:25 am

      You sir, are ignorance on parade.

    • James D Burroughs Jr April 26, 2019, 10:02 am

      “She wants to use her executive powers to force anyone who sells more than five firearms per year to conduct background checks on all future gun sales.”

      In short they can sell 4 firearms without a back ground check? How ridiculous is that?

    • Poggy April 26, 2019, 10:11 am

      For being smart (presumably) she and others, should visit what SHALL NOT INFRINGE means.

  • Mark N. April 25, 2019, 1:10 am

    She is trying to sell (some) voters on the idea that she is a gun owner too, in order to suggest that she will protect 2A rights. Don’t believe a word of it. She is the reason that the California Roster, at least for semi-auto handguns, was frozen in May 2013 as to any new models, resulting in a dramatic reduction over time in the number of pistols available for purchase. She hates guns (except when they are protecting her with her illegal private “police” force), she hates gun owners. She hates semiauto rifles. She hates gun manufacturers. Never forget. She is as bad as or worse than Hellary.

  • SuperG April 24, 2019, 10:31 am

    Yeah, the gang-bangers, who account for the majority of the murders, always legally buy their guns. Democrats making an issue out of a non-issue.

  • Dr Motown April 24, 2019, 7:49 am

    \”Unlicensed sellers\” is apparently the new moniker for thieves and black market dealers….SMDH

    • SJ April 26, 2019, 4:20 am

      And, of course, as they illegally sell more than five stolen/illegally acquired handguns per year, will go get their FFL license and perform background checks per her new regulations????!

    • Mark N. April 26, 2019, 8:53 am

      The ATF recognizes that, under federal law, it is legal to sell firearms as long as one is not “in the business” of selling firearms. What constitutes “being in the business” was for years an undefined, and the ambiguity made it difficult to prosecute persons selling large numbers of guns. As I understand it, however, a regulation was adopted that sets the limit at 5 per year, after which selling without an FFL would be deemed unlawful business. If I am correct about that, then what she proposes is already law. Funny, a lot of these candidates keep telling people that “there oughtta be a law”–when many times there already is.

  • Bobs your uncle April 23, 2019, 11:44 pm

    As an admitted drug user she needs to turn in her firearms

    • Poggy April 26, 2019, 10:13 am

      I believe she has stated that she carries…..
      I wonder if she is in violation of both CA & DC law
      and the states she goes thru with hers, or
      if she is violating homeland security when flying?

Leave a Comment

Send this to a friend