NRA Releases Manchin Attack Ad, He is ‘Part of the Problem’

Sen. Joe Manchin is no longer getting any love from the nation’s gun lobby.

The National Rifle Association released an attack ad this week that smacks the West Virginia Democrat with a “D” rating.

“They want to take away your Second Amendment. You see what’s going on. I don’t think you want your Second Amendment played with,” says President Trump at a rally that is played in the ad. “Joe Manchin always voted for Obama. And I like Joe, but Joe doesn’t vote for us.”

Trump then goes on to endorse the incumbent’s Republican challenger, “We must elect Patrick Morrisey, we need him.”

Morrisey, the West Virginia attorney general, is trailing Manchin by eight points according to a recent poll put out by Research America Inc. Though, that gap may be overstated as data from the same poll indicates that Morrisey’s supporters are more “engaged” in the November Midterms.

“Morrisey voters tend to be more interested and engaged in this year’s election than Manchin voters – which could impact voter turnout,” the poll states.

Manchin fell out of favor with the NRA when he teamed up with Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) on a universal background check bill in the wake of the mass killing at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

SEE ALSO: Sen. Manchin: Background Checks More Likely Under Trump, Than Obama

Up until that point, Manchin was an “A”-rated candidate in the eyes of the NRA.

“Joe Manchin is committed to protecting the Right to Keep and Bear Arms guaranteed to all Americans,” said Chris Cox, chairman of the NRA’s Political Victory Fund (PVF) in 2012.

Cox added, ”His strong dedication and voting record have earned him an ‘A’ rating from the NRA-PVF, and we proudly endorse him for re-election to the U.S. Senate.”

The Manchin-Toomey background check bill never cleared the Senate under Obama. With the election of president Trump, Manchin was actually more sanguine about its chance of being passed because, as Manchin said in 2017, unlike Obama, “There’s no one who believes he’s [Trump] going to take their guns away.”

The hope that Trump would back that bill was evident as late as this past Spring.  During the post-Parkland “gun violence” talks at the White House, Trump had mentioned looking at background checks as one of the ways to address mass killings along with extraconstitutional gun seizures.

“It’s not gun control, it’s gun sense,” said Manchin on a March 4th appearance on CBS News’ “Face the Nation.” “I’m very hopeful. President Trump has said background checks [are] needed. This bill of ours, the Manchin-Toomey bill, should be the base bill they work off of.”

Of course, nothing in the way of criminalizing private transfers — which is essentially what Manchin-Toomey was designed to do — came out of Congress in the months to follow.

***Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica!  All Local Sales Are FREE!***

About the author: S.H. Blannelberry is the News Editor of GunsAmerica.

{ 9 comments… add one }
  • Mike Watkins September 8, 2018, 2:56 pm

    Smart people are leaving CA every day. Also NY, NJ, IL and quite a few other would-be socialist workers paradises.

  • Corey Appel September 7, 2018, 4:36 pm

    Can’t imagine kowtowing to California’s list of approved firearms. I would get whatever I want and take my chances as I had done here in Illinois before we got concealed carry.

  • Rangemaster11B September 7, 2018, 1:38 pm

    It would be nice if NRA would explain the downgrade from A to D.

  • ~ Occams September 7, 2018, 6:38 am

    “They want to take away your Second Amendment. You see what’s going on. I don’t think you want your Second Amendment played with,” says President Trump”

    Hey, Trumplstilskin?

    Come out to California and review ‘shall not be infringed’, and tell me again how I don’t want ‘my 2nd amendment played with’……PLAYED WITH, m’kay pal?

    What the hell is the point of the ‘US’ – ‘United States’ – Constitution – if every state can do whatever it wants in ignoring it?

    I just called an FFL dealer. Was thinking about getting an HK .40 pistol.

    Nope. “Not on the ‘approved’ list. I can’t have THAT .40. I can order others, but THAT pistol is ‘illegal’ because it wasn’t ‘approved’.

    No. No ‘playing’ going on here, Mr. Failure. They ain’t playing at all. They’re doing whatever they please, Constitution be damned.

    • Dr Motown September 7, 2018, 8:15 am

      Your problem in CA (and IL, NJ, NY, MD) will ONLY be solved by SCOTUS. An executive order cannot be issued to override your state’s policy. So far, John Roberts has been too scared to take up another 2A case, but that can change as more real conservative/originalist judges are appointed by President Trump. Relief is on the way, but we need Kavanaugh to be appointed ASAP, and old Ruthie and Breyer to take some dirt naps.

    • Boss September 7, 2018, 10:19 am

      If everyone in CA who owned a gun would VOTE, you could change things. Don’t push the blame on someone else!

      • ~ Occams September 7, 2018, 11:35 am

        lol…All the Snowflakes seek ‘Utopia’ that ruined Kalifornia and the dream it once was overwhelmed everything else.

      • bison1913 September 7, 2018, 1:13 pm

        The problem with that is just about everyone in CA who votes is an illegal alien. There for they vote for free stuff… The Democrat way.

      • joefoam September 7, 2018, 4:29 pm

        That is a fact. You have to get informed and get out and vote!

Leave a Comment

Send this to a friend