Subscribe To the GunsAmerica Digest and News This Week

Caught on Camera: Donors say ‘Hillary Will Shut Down’ 2A Rights

Send to Kindle

The video above comes from Project Veritas Action, the group of undercover journalists who are attempting to reveal Hillary Clinton’s real agenda when it comes to, among other issues, our right to keep and bear arms.

Here is the PVA write-up:

In this video released by Project Veritas Action, James O’Keefe exposes Hillary Clinton’s plan to ban all guns through an executive order. In the video, James O’Keefe attends a private top donor campaign fundraiser for Democratic Senate candidate Russ Feingold. He attended the fundraiser the same day that a Project Veritas journalist was burned in the Feingold campaign.

While at the fundraiser, which was hosted by Clinton friend and donor Amy Rao, a Project Veritas journalist spoke with former Senator Feingold and his donors about gun control. When asked what Hillary Clinton would do about the Second Amendment, Feingold said without hesitation, “Well, there might be an executive order.”

If I’m being honest, I’m a bit torn by the revelatory importance of these videos. On one hand, we already know Hillary Clinton is a rabidly anti-gun presidential candidate who poses an existential threat to the Second Amendment! Don’t we?

If elected, she will appoint gun-grabbing justices to the Supreme Court. She will support legislation in Congress that would cripple one’s right to keep and bear arms. She will use executive fiat to enact measures that chill one’s 2A rights. We know all this, right? At present, Clinton’s anti-gun agenda shouldn’t be news to anyone who even moderately supports the 2A. So, these videos don’t really show or tell us anything we didn’t already know.

SEE ALSO: Secret Video Shows ’Crooked’ Hillary Delegate Explaining Democrat Approach to Banning Guns

On the other hand, these videos do provide a glimpse into the opinions of the flippant and uninformed Hillary donors and supporters who are completely clueless when it comes to gun rights and gun ownership in this country. It’s good to see who we’re up against and the specious arguments they iterate to foist the anti-gun agenda. Plus, and to sort of contradict my earlier point, when it comes to evidence to expose Clinton for the corrupt, anti-Constitution candidate she is, I suppose we can never have enough because there are still voters out there, presumably many non-gun owners, who remain unconvinced about her ambition to limit basic rights and individual freedoms.

Speaking of additional evidence, there is a Clinton campaign email that was uncovered by Wikileaks that shows Clinton press secretary Brain Fallon talking about Hillary’s goal of pushing gun control via executive fiat. Dated Oct. 4, 2015, Fallon wrote:

Circling back around on guns as a follow up to the Friday morning discussion: the Today show has indicated they definitely plan to ask bout guns, and so to have the discussion be more of a news event than her previous times discussing guns, we are going to background reporters tonight on a few of the specific proposals she would support as President – universal background checks of course, but also closing the gun show loophole by executive order and imposing manufacturer liability.

Now, again, none of this should come as a surprise for those familiar with the Hillary platform. What’s interesting, though, is that Obama actually tried to close the putative “gun show loophole” by executive action last January (He probably got the idea from Hillary). Did it work? No, not really. Private sellers can still sell to private buyers without having to go to an FFL to get a background check.

What Obama did was try to put more scrutiny on private transactions with the threat that if the ATF can prove one is “engaged in the business” of selling firearms, which requires a license and a mandate to perform background check of prospective purchasers, one may be punished by up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

This is exactly the approach Fallon was hinting at in the email about the “Today Show.” To corroborate this suggestion, an Oct. 5, 2015, article from CNN contains the following:

If Congress won’t act Clinton “will take administrative action to require that any person attempting to sell a significant number of guns be deemed ‘in the business’ of selling firearms,” the aide said, meaning they will fall under background check laws.

As mentioned, Obama tried this approach and failed. Of course, that’s not all he’s tried over the years.  The following were all efforts his administration made to chill gun rights while he sat in the oval office: mandatory reporting of gun sales for border-state gun sellers, the ATF’s attempt to reclassify (ban!) green tip ammo, those costly ITAR license requirements and fees for recreational gunsmiths and hobbyists, just to name a few.

Undoubtedly, Hillary will pick up where Obama left off and leave no stone unturned when it comes to dreaming up ways to attack the 2A. For me, that’s no more obvious today than it was yesterday before I reviewed all this new evidence. She’s bad, bad news. Help spread the word to those who still yet need convincing.

{ 10 comments… add one }
  • Patriot October 16, 2016, 8:02 pm

    Hillary has done many things that are due to very poor judgement. Her actions were seriously wrong and some were detrimental to national security, such as, while she was Secretary of State, her obvious mishandling of classified State Department emails. Her lack of any action during the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi very clearly showed her lack of leadership and caused the horrific deaths of four people. Hillary now feels that she is qualified to be Commander in Chief and has the ability to protect the entire United States. Hillary prefers to have “open borders” so millions of illegal aliens and probably terrorists could enter the U.S. and become Democrat voters. Hillary believes the terrorists in Guantanamo should be released and Guantanamo should be given to Communist Cuba. Hillary’s actions described above absolutely do not qualify her to be president !!

    Also, and we are looking at the character and judgement of someone who hopes to be president, Hillary and Bill stole many items from the White House at the end of Bill’s presidency and had to be ordered to return the items. It is ludicrous that a person of this caliber should be elected president. Hillary and Bill were totally dishonest. Bill had sexual activities in the Oval Office and was impeached for lies, if I am correct, and now Hillary and Bill want to move back to the White House with the power of a president. Surely he would be Hillary’s main advisor even after his presidential sexual activities and impeachment. The United States deserves much better than this !!

    VOTE FOR TRUMP AND REPUBLICANS !!

  • JoeUSooner October 14, 2016, 3:27 pm

    Yes, any such legislation, to “cripple the right to keep and bear arms,”would be unconstitutional… as long as the Supreme Court interprets the 2nd Amendment as referring specifically to INDIVIDUAL rights. The instant the Supreme Court is stocked with liberal justices who change that interpretation to refer only to COLLECTIVE ownership rights (and that is absolutely possible – and it has a very practical real-world likelihood to occur – if Hillary is elected), gun rights for all American private citizens will indeed be crippled.

    At any one time out here in the real world, laws are exactly as constitutional or unconstitutional as the Supreme Court declares…

  • Miguel Raton October 14, 2016, 3:08 pm

    We already *have* “responsible gun law” – it’s called the 2nd Amendment you morons! Just more of Lenin’s useful idiots, doing their damage.

    All we need to do is try, convict & hang *one* congressman or senator for treason on the basis of undermining the Constitution they swore to uphold [their oath of office] and the rest will fall back into line. Let’s make it clear: failing to uphold the B of R by attempting to pass gun laws in contravention of the 2nd Amendment is *TREASON*, and will be punished accordingly. End of story.

  • Larry October 14, 2016, 2:01 pm

    Evil personified! I still say take the oath to never ever again vote for anyone with a “D” behind their name. That way, you put a hole in all their freedom denying plans. My neighbor is running for a local seat as a Dem & he does not get my vote even though he, himself is a rather conservative man. My thinking is that if he still runs on a corrupt party ticket, why should he get my vote? Support freedom. Defeat Hillary!

  • Ram6 October 14, 2016, 11:49 am

    What people should be concerned with beyond Hillary Clinton’s admitted attempts to curtail or eliminate the 2nd amendment rights of Americans is her propensity to impose by fiat any manner of rules and regulations and indeed laws on her fellow citizens. Mrs. Clinton doesn’t consider the rest of us as “fellow” citizens. She considers us to be subjects to be “ruled” by “The First Woman President of the United States of America” as she has shouted out at rallies.

    First the 2nd amendment, then what? Freedom of religion (religious liberty), mandatory single payer, government health care, federal control of all elections, imposition of special surtaxes to cover her elaborate progressive expenditures? I mean where exactly does it stop? My guess is nowhere.

    Congress has shown itself to be the single most impotent branch of the U.S. Government and the judiciary is now overpopulated by liberals and she will appoint at least two and possibly three new Supreme Court Justices, so we the people for whom the government is supposed to be responsible will be at the mercy of an absolute tyrant. Be afraid, be very afraid of this woman and this party getting control following the last 8 years of the feckless and reckless Obama administration. This will be the Obama agenda on steroids.

  • gary October 14, 2016, 11:21 am

    This Executive Power has gone too far!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It needs to taken away as it is being abused !!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Patriot October 14, 2016, 10:41 am

    An assessment of Hillary’s qualifications to be president of the United States would be DISMAL !!!! Think about the qualifications of her supporters described below !!!! Think about her very poor judgement and lies in the mishandling of the State Department CLASSIFIED EMAILS. Think about her very poor judgement and total lack of effort to help the American ambassador and three assistants who were killed in Benghzi, Libya. (Remember Secretary of State Hillary saying “ARE WE GOING BACK TO THAT?” which was a huge humiliation for her and terrible reflection on her judgement when questioned by a Congressional Committee. This also applies to Secretary of State Hillary’s poor judgement and lack of support for Americans in life threatening situations when employed by the State Department she controlled. “BENGHAZI – WE HAD THE TIME, PLANES AND SHIPS. WE DID NOT HAVE THE LEADERSHIP !!!!” Hillary as president would be very devisive and an extreme risk and would seem to be an “endless misery” to American citizens. She has already stated that her little deranged mind feels that the U.S. Supreme Court made the “wrong decision” when the Court said the Second Amendment applies to American citizens rather than militias. She declares that she and her rotten supporters will make a maximum effort to change that Supreme Court decision !! She would be a very poor person to appoint nominees for Supreme Court vacancies !! Hillary has been a strong advocate for illegal immigration and so has Obama. It has been said that Democrat politicians have been in favor of support payments for illegal immigrants. Support payments would assure votes for Democrats when the illegals are made legal by Democrat executive action. IT WOULD BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES TO ELECT TRUMP AND REPUBLICANS !!!!

    If a deranged Hillary and her rotten supporters try to usurp the Constitution and Second Amendment and there is no attempt by government or courts to stop Hillary and supporters, Americans who support the Constitution may have no choice other than forcefully resisting to save the United States.

    I am sure there are many countries who support Communists and terrorists that are happy to see a clique of people in the United States who are so radical that they want to mis-interpret the Second Amendment in order to disarm the American people and
    make them as defenseless as the people of Russia, Iran, North Korea, etc. so Americans would not be armed and able to defend themselves against a tyrannical government and terrorists.
    Several of these radicals, including the network “news”, who are mostly Democrats, are listed below:

    The biased network “news” media fully supports Hillary and radical Democrats. The network “news” media and Hillary, Billy, and Chelsea supporters, such as Obama, Tim Kaine is Hillary’s selection for Vice President, Pelosi, Feinstein, Boxer are rotten gun grabber politicians from California, Gov. Brown of California, Gov. Brown of Oregon, Gov. Inslee of Washington are Democrat gun grabbers from three states, Bloomberg is a major gun grabber radical and financier who contrives with “news anchor” Katy Couric to make the pro gun people seem to be confused and stupid on network “news”, Soros is a major gun grabber idiot who is a friend of Hillary and owns Progressive insurance, Sen. Schumer of New York wants to stack the U.S. Supreme Court with gun grabber Democrat justices that will comply with deranged Hillary, Katie Couric who contrived with Bloomberg to make the network “news” represent pro gun people as confused and stupid, Attorney General of Massachusetts Maura Healey who dictated that certain common guns are illegal, Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada who, as Democrat Majority Leader of the Senate, refused to hear Republican legislation, Dan Gross who is leader of the gun grabber Brady Bunch, Rupert Murdoch who is a biased gun grabber Democrat of FOX NEWS, pseudo-Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine says she will NOT vote for Trump, and so does pseudo-Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham and pseudo-Republican Sen. Mitt Romney, and all have something in common and it is the fact that all are ROTTEN TO THE CORE AND DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS BEST FOR THE UNITED STATES !!!!

  • Gingerbaker October 14, 2016, 7:56 am

    “If elected, she will appoint gun-grabbing justices to the Supreme Court. She will support legislation in Congress that would cripple one’s right to keep and bear arms. She will use executive fiat to enact measures that chill one’s 2A rights. We know all this, right? ”

    No, we don’t know this at all. Actually, that’s incorrect – we know that’s all a load of complete bollocks. And you probably know it’s bullshit, but you don’t care, because you gotta keep the natives restless.

    “cripple one’s right to keep and bear arms”?!? Bullshit. Any such legislation would be unconstitutional. And you know it.

    ” She will use executive fiat to enact measures that chill one’s 2A rights.” Same bullshit again. And you know it, you propagandist.

    Hey – here is an idea – why not try responsible journalism and gun rights advocacy instead of being a bullshit artist?

    • DRAINO October 14, 2016, 9:24 am

      Kool-Aid drinker! If you think they have any other intentions…..you are delusional. She will appoint liberal justices, then what ever she wants, she will get. Not sure what country you are living in, but here in America, we are in danger from the liberal fanatic politicians. They don’t care bout the Constitution….they will make it a “living document” and change it at their whim. If she is elected, our country is in for massive change….for the worse. There will be no more freedoms. Besides, she said this stuff herself…..and you still don’t believe it? Hallucinate much…?!?!?!?

    • Ralph Solli October 15, 2016, 12:22 am

      Gingerbaker, you are living in a fools paradise. Perhaps you should ask those gun owners in California, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and other states that have their 2nd Amendment rights crippled, if it’s all Bullshit. Ask them what happened when they attempted to have these unconstitutional laws nullified in court. they will tell you how the Federal Appellate court upheld the law even after saying the law would not prevent any crimes. Then the Supreme Court, without Justice Scalia refused to here the case. Here is a better idea, why not try to look up the facts and extrapolate what the danger is if Hillary Clinton is able to not only enact unconstitutional executive order but load the Supreme Court with a majority of liberal Justices that will support those orders.

Leave a Comment

Send this to friend