Estimated reading time: 3 minutes
Susanna Gibson, a Democratic House candidate for Virginia, is facing scrutiny this week after videos surfaced showing her performing sexual acts online for “tips”, The Washington Post is reporting.
A nurse practitioner and mother of two young children, Gibson is running in a pivotal suburban district in Richmond.
Table of contents
Chaturbate for ‘Tips’
The Chaturbate platform, which combines “masturbating” and “chatting online,” showcased Gibson and her husband’s live sessions.
Gibson solicited “tips” for particular sex acts in these videos, possibly breaching Chaturbate’s user guidelines against demanding money for specific acts.
“I need, like, more tokens before I let him do that,” she responds to a request from a viewer. “One token, no. More. Raising money for a good cause.”
Endorsement from Giffords, Moms Demand Action
The 40-year-old is endorsed by prominent gun-control organizations, Moms Demand Action and Giffords.
I'm thrilled to announce that my campaign has been awarded the 2023 Moms Demand Action Gun Sense Candidate distinction! Gun violence prevention is a top priority of mine, and it is personal. (THREAD) pic.twitter.com/XoaUg2eXin
— Susanna Gibson (@SusannaSGibson) May 4, 2023
SEE ALSO: David Hogg Defends Gun Rights?!?
I'm proud to stand with Congresswoman Giffords.
— Susanna Gibson (@SusannaSGibson) August 30, 2023
As Delegate, I look forward to partnering with @giffords to pass common sense gun violence prevention legislation. I am determined to keep our neighborhoods safe. https://t.co/DOhxpJYRFx
Gibson Responds
Responding to the release of the vids, Gibson labeled it as “an illegal invasion of my privacy designed to humiliate me and my family.”
“It won’t intimidate me and it won’t silence me,” she added in a statement. “My political opponents and their Republican allies have proven they’re willing to commit a sex crime to attack me and my family because there’s no line they won’t cross to silence women when they speak up.”
Gibson’s attorney, Daniel P. Watkins, told The Washington Post that it’s a Class 1 misdemeanor to distribute sexual material with the “intent to coerce, harass, or intimidate.”
“We are working closely with state and federal law enforcement,” Watkins said.
Does it get sicker than this "mother?" She's a Democrat running for a seat in the Virginia legislature. Now, she's desperate to hide online sex acts she committed with her husband for money. She lashes out against Republicans! What a disgusting fool. And so far, the Democrat…
— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) September 12, 2023
Republican Opponent Weighs In
David Owen, the opposing Republican candidate, learned about the videos along with the general public.
Expressing sympathy, Owen stated, “I’m sure this is a difficult time for Susanna and her family, and I’m remaining focused on my campaign.”
Both Gibson and Owen, backed by their parties’ top echelons, vie for the vacant 57th House District seat, spanning parts of Henrico and Goochland counties.
The election is slated for Nov. 7. Do you think Gibson’s foray into adult content will help or hurt her chances?
*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! All Local Sales are FREE! ***
im about freedom and despise those who want to enslave. the first step to enslavement is to take the right of self defense with effective weapons. I don’t care what this wannabe tyrant does on chaturbate. it neither picks my pocket or breaks my bones
Typical liberal, how she feels should be law and to hell with the facts or anybody else.
” I’m thrilled to announce that my campaign has been awarded the 2023 Moms Demand Action Gun Sense Candidate distinction! Gun violence prevention is a top priority of mine, and it is personal. (THREAD) pic.twitter.com/XoaUg2eXin— Susanna Gibson (@SusannaSGibson) May 4, 2023″
She wants to be a “Joan of Arc” and expect that the people who disagree with her to remain silent.
Well for the outright infringement of those who want to protect the 2nd Amendment it becomes personal too!
Typical Leftist want to trumpet their opinion and stance on a subject but expect that if you oppose them that the opposition should remain silent.
In Love, War and Politics all is fair.
Well that’s how life is and especially in politics.
Another nasty dimocrat, she vacant stare, yuck!
Because they are all prostitutes
Yup, dimmercrap, demon possessed.
This woman is America all wrapped up in one knucklehead.
Doing all manner of crazy garbage publicly and then getting upset that it’s been noticed and commented on.
Suzanna is doing to ‘her’ reputation what America’s Government has done to America’s reputation.
A visceral and also visual example of the whorishness of gun control “advocates” in particular and leftists in general. If she’ll do this or that for tips on the internet, what will she do for cash if she’s elected to office? Bribery and grift=true bidenomics.
I wonder, if at any point, those in the pro-2nd community will admit to their hypocrisy?
The purpose of the 2nd amendment was to guarantee that “We the People” maintain OUR Militia, “necessary to the security of a free State”, with the power and authority “to execute the Laws of the Union” as commanded by the Constitution.
What does that mean? It means that we the people are the ultimate “author and source of the Law”, and therefore there can be no government entity that has power over us. In terms of the doctrine of law, as recognized throughout the entire world, the Sovereign, in the U.S. it is the people, are not constrained by organic acts of the legislature as We reconcile whether or not the act is to be enforced. Since, We, when we act in accordance with Militia statutes are Law Enforcement, the entire matter is for us to decide, and it is our right and Duty to Indict, arrest, prosecute, and punish those, such as “Moms” for their violations of the laws that we ourselves deny.
Since, the Constitution clearly states Militia as the only recognized authority “to execute the Laws of the Union”, legal doctrine dictates that so-called law enforcement agencies cannot be created that are not an agency of Militia.
In other words, We are in charge, but I’ve learned over many years that once you get this through the dick skulls of pretend to be pro-2nd people, they turn a blind eye and deaf ear because they want nothing to do with the Duty that comes with such awesome power. So, we allow corrupt institutions to thread on us, and we allow corrupt politicians to create the means to our enslavement.
Read “A Case Of Treason” for an indebt look at the subject.
so we have to enslave them to keep them from enslaving us?
nah,I’ll leave you be until you eff with me enough. then ill deal with you. how bout we give liberty a chance? but I dream 🙁
Well, Well. typical Democrap. There is no privacy when you go public. LOL
Hey, isn’t this the same pornstar Trump had dealings with?
No Trump’s was a bit uglier. This woman only did things with her husband so calling her a pornstar is a reach.
Hey dummy your TDS is showing, try to keep your pea brain on topic.
Elect this clown and you’ll get the circus….
Fricken democrats.
A guy like you might think that lol.
Another degenerate from the left ? I’m not surprised .
I believe that to be a requirement for them . The more
shocking , the better .
SO Trump f’ed a pornstar and lied about it? Can you say hypocrisy?
You seem to be obsessed with the 45th President for
some reason . You do realize he is no longer in office ,
do you not ?
Anyone ever notice 99% of Democrat woman are dumb and ugly, the other 1% are dumb skanks.
She appears to be a very qualified for congress with all her years of experience Fu(k1ng someone on camera.
A person’s sex life has nothing to do with how well she will perform in office. In Italy a prostitute was elected and was one of the best politicians Italy ever had. The Far Right Religious Fanatics do not realize that the U.S.is going the way of Europe with Churches closing at a rapid rate because they no longer have enough patrons to pay their bills. The Far Right let Religion get in the way of just common sense.
If you want to critique then do it based on whether her gun control philosophy is sound and needed, the latter is rather obvious considering we have a mass murder about every other day in the U.S. and even many Conservatives are fed up with this.
Civilized countries do not have the gun problem that the U.S. does and its because of their strict gun control laws which have proven to save thousands of lives a year. No civilized country on earth has on average 45,000 gun deaths a year except the U.S., that should tell even the mentally challenged we have a serious gun problem. Unfortunately the extreme paranoia of the Far Right prevent them from accepting reality or science.
Thanks for your input , Komsomol comrade .
The chairman will be pleased . Expect an extra
chocolate ration this week .
Your avatar is well-chosen.
Fu@king on camera for $$ then blaming the political opposition for being caught is sound resume material for a prospective State representative. At least, to the far-left.
Christianity built Western European civilization which translated to North America. Europeans in their smug secularism are beginning to realize those “closed churches” are a vacuum that will be filled by something and it’s looking a lot like mosques….wonder how that’ll work out for comfy European cultural continuity.
BTW…it was that continuity and homogeneity that gives Europe it’s generally peaceful nature, not gun laws. I lived there and saw firsthand how many guns there are. They just don’t shoot each other, except where that culture has been abandoned. Peacefully smarmy – and now, very multiculti – Sweden now leads the continent in the criminal misuse of firearms.
If your contention were true, as was said of the Mongolian Empire, a young virgin should be able to ride unmolested from one end of gun-controlled Mexico to the next with saddle bags full of gold.
If you have a daughter or sister, volunteer her and get back to us.
come on, stormy was gross and trump was pigging.
every man goes through that phase at least once. and ill vote for trump again so tds that lol
“Civilized countries”? Define that, because by the definition, the U.S. IS a ‘civilized’ Nation.
I personally don’t care about her on line games, HOWEVER she IS using it FOR A POLITICAL agenda, or did you miss that????????
Therefore, she is open to criticism pertaining to it, SHE made it a political platform.
Honestly, I think your post was half thought out, you really didn’t put much though into the why’s and what for’s of her actions, now did you?
Yes, you are right, but have you noticed their other problems? Stabbings are such an issue in the UK that they actually have laws banning almost every type of knife that you can think of except for maybe a swiss army type pocketknife. Gun laws do not work, humans have always killed each other in one way or another. Sin is the correct term for this problem and any sane person understands this phrase, “you cannot legislate morality.” Have you ever broken the speed limit? Then you are a criminal. Period. It is a law, hence the right of the cop to pull you over and give you a speeding ticket. Breaking the law is the same regardless of the law broken. These countries all have their issues as any sane person knows, removing one weapon will just open the door to other means. And when you remove all of the people’s ability to defend themselves guess what happens, dictatorship. I have lived in countries where the citizen does not have the right to defend themselves, usually one rises up to oppress the masses, either the government, or a rebel group. Sorry, your logic is flawed.
Exactly. Republicans are hypocrites considering they seem to forget Trump cheated on his wife with a true pornstar and lied about it.
Trump living rent free in your empty head, that must really suck for you.lol
Let me get this straight. This woman has sex with her husband, in front of cameras, and broadcasts it publicly on an internet platform. THEN, when someone else picks up on it and releases the same videos again publicly — THAT’s an “illegal invasion of her privacy”??? What privacy? SHE’s the one who released that footage publicly.
She should go back to medicine; she surely doesn’t understand law at all.
Oh and, don’t forget that as a candidate, she’s a “public figure” and under New York Times v. Sullivan, essentially has no privacy rights.
Jeez! And THIS is what the Democrats have come to for candidates? I knew they had a really shallow bench, but this is ridiculous!
How many tokens to do the dog?
A politician fornicating for money? Who would’ve guessed.
This is more proof that absolutely no standards what so ever are needed to be in the democrat party. After all, it is known as the party of weak minded fools.
Yes, that is the shocked look on my face. Anything for a buck, typical democrat
Is this the best version of false morality that the Pagan face of lefty America can offer?
“is that a gun in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?”………fooking lunatics