Montana Hunters Cited, Fined for Killing Two Wolves from a Helicopter

Montana Hunters Cited, Fined for Killing Two Wolves from a Helicopter
The men killed two adult wolves, one male, one female. (Photo: Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks)

Two Montana hunters were cited and fined this month for killing two wolves from a helicopter.

Dalton Thomas Tamcke, 30, and Justin Samuel Peterson, 22, claimed to have mistaken the wolves for coyotes during a legal aerial hunt, according to a report from the Montana Standard.

Montana does offer permits to hunt predatory animals from a helicopter, but hunting wolves from a helicopter is always illegal. In addition, the men did not have wolf tags or permission to hunt on the property.

They retrieved the carcasses on a snowmobile and brought them home, and they told a game warden that they had no plans to report the kills.

They were charged with the unlawful take of non-game wildlife in need of management, failure to obtain landowner permission for hunting, and violation of commission or department orders or rules (for shooting the animal from an aircraft).

Tamcke paid a $425 fine and Peterson paid a $435 fine, but neither lost their hunting privileges nor were required to pay the $1,000 gray wolf restitution cost.

SEE ALSO: New York Man Accused of Rigging Former Hunting Camp Cabin to Explode

“We gave them breaks on that in reward for their cooperation,” Montana Fish Wildlife & Parks Game Warden Kerry Wahl told the Standard.

The wardens also didn’t verify that the hunters had aerial permits to hunt coyotes.

“I have no reason to believe they did not get it. They seemed familiar with that process,” Wahl said.

Despite the relatively light punishment, Wahl said he doubted that they mistook the wolves for coyotes. The men claim to have shot the animals with a shotgun and buckshot, which usually requires the hunter to be within about 30 yards of his quarry.

“There is a big difference between a wolf and a coyote in terms of size. A wolf can be two and a half times the size of a coyote, maybe three times the size of a coyote. To me personally, I guess if you’re going to be flying low to shoot coyotes you probably more than likely should be able to tell whether they were wolves or coyotes,” Wahl said.

He also expressed concern that the men did not plan to turn in the animals.

SEE ALSO: Arizona Offering $10,000 Reward for Information Leading to Poacher’s Arrest

“The big concern I had with this case is there really wasn’t going to be any intention to turn themselves in or let us know what happened. They did say they were just going to get them skinned and not report them. But anytime somebody shoots a wolf, they’re required to be reported and tagged by us. They were not going to do that. They did say that,” Wahl said.

It’s unclear how the wardens were tipped off to the violation. They found the wolves in a garage two days after the incident, according to “someone in the area” who spoke to the Standard.

The Montana FWP rarely issues the maximum penalty for citations related to wolves, according to a public records request filed by The Montana State News Bureau. In the last five years, the FWP has issued 29 citations and nine written warnings for the hunting and trapping of wolves.

Of the citations, 12 were for the illegal taking, killing, possession, or waste of a wolf, which can result in a $1,000 restitution, but only one citation resulted in restitution.

Hunters interested in going after wolves legally in Montana can check out all the regulations and licensing requirements on the FWP website.

***Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! All Local Sales are FREE!***

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • J Rhodes February 11, 2022, 11:50 am

    With these two criminals stating clearly that they had no intention of reporting the two kills. It seems $1000, restitution and firearm confiscation would be in order.

  • Kelly Facteau May 18, 2021, 12:02 pm

    I find this utterly ridiculous. Wolves are endanger. I don’t care how or where they may or may not have permits. I am saddened. I see the demise of the American Bison happening to the wolves. Not to mention other animals that are shot simply for some TROPHY. Hunting is to feed your family not to boost your God complex.

  • Dave May 18, 2021, 10:55 am

    What a shame. Since they weren’t compelled to surrender the carcass’s, what’s the current value of the brain-tanned hides versus the minimal fines they paid? So the take-away is: More profitable to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission.

  • Randy Allen May 17, 2021, 10:34 am

    They should have lost their hunting rights and their guns, in this case. I think hunting from an helicopter should be illegal. If you can’t get on the ground to hunt, stay home. Chickenshits! Hunting is a sport, but from a helicopter, it is an execution.

  • Ken May 17, 2021, 9:28 am

    The state doesn’t punish it when the power brokers in the ranching industry condone it. It’s understandable why the the ranchers feel they way they do regarding how much damage a wolf pack can do! However The wolf was here long before man was. We’ve hunted them to near extinction levels. This was a killing and a assassination , at the very least. This was anything that remotely resembled hunting. Especially concerning was they had no intention to report their so called mistake . Yes they cooperated once they were caught. A first year defense attorney would have given them that much advice at that point! It worked out better for them than those two wolves ! I’ve hunted since I was 10. These two idiots are not hunters They should turn in their licenses ! They apparently have no honor!

  • rick reeve May 17, 2021, 9:15 am

    10 years is not long enough should not be allowed guns should be convected felons sick trigger happy a holes them the kind of scum that spoil good hunters put the in jail for a few years

  • PB- dave May 17, 2021, 8:42 am

    Not sure I’m in favor of shooting from a helicopter. The altitude, downward angle, and light effects don’t lend itself to seeing silhouette shape, or judging size accurately. Difference in fur colors, terrain features could possibly explain the “mistake” , but if not 100% sure don’t take the shot. The $400 fine + probably $2000 in legal fees should be a hard reminder of poor judgement, however I’d like to have seen a remedial hunting course and 2 year hunting privilege revocation added to the fine.

  • Bob May 4, 2021, 9:59 am

    I believe that these (2) supposed hunters, I use that term loosely.
    They should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, loose there hunting privileges for up to ten years.
    That’s not a very good example to set for others to follow.

Send this to a friend