Lightweight and Accurate: Christensen Arms Ranger 22 Reviewed

22 LR has a soft spot in the heart of most all gun enthusiasts because of the pure versatility of the round as well as the memories that may be attached to the cartridge from the very conception of their firearm training as a child. Gun owners now have a new option in this rimfire market: the Christenson Arms Ranger 22.

Spending the day on the range with the Ranger 22 was incredibly fun due to the low cost of shooting, high accuracy, and quiet suppressor host that it is.

Christensen Arms released a new rifle offering at SHOT Show 2020, and I am lucky enough to have one of the first samples that were sent out. I received this rifle well before it began shipping to stores, and consequently, it may be a bit different than the version that you will find on the shelf for sale… but more on that later.

About the Ranger 22

The Ranger 22 is an ultralight, full-sized rifle with an 18″ carbon fiber tension barrel, carbon fiber stock, aluminum receiver, and overall streamlined design that bring it in at a shockingly low weight of 5.1 pounds! We also have the engineers behind this rifle’s design to thank for building it up around Ruger 10/22 magazines and Remington 700 drop-in triggers. If you happen to not like the (phenomenal) Trigger Tech trigger or the 10 round Ruger 10/22 magazine that this rifle comes with, there are a myriad of aftermarket replacement parts available for your customization.

The Ranger 22 comes with a Trigger Tech Primary trigger that is set by the factory at 3 pounds. This rifle also uses the popular Ruger 10/22 magazines that are already prominent on the market.

In Depth Look

Starting at the muzzle of the rifle, we have a 1/2×28 TPI threaded muzzle for attaching your favorite muzzle accessory. In my case, I installed an OSS RAD 22 rimfire suppressor. Moving back, you find where the steel barrel core butts into a hollow carbon fiber tube that is under tension, keeping the barrel’s vibration down and keeping it cool to the touch on the outside, ultimately you get a lighter and more accurate barrel with this design.

A closer look at the muzzle threads on the Ranger 22 and how you can attach muzzle devices.

The barrel screws into an aluminum action which features a side bolt release, 0 MOA Picatinny rail, and a Trigger Tech Remington 700 trigger. The bolt on the Ranger 22 is extremely small in diameter and milled where possible, further reducing weight. The bolt knob is interchangeable and comes with a fluted knob for both improved grip and weight reduction.

Here, you can see how the button on the side of the action releases the bolt. Also, notice the unique geometry of the Ranger 22’s bolt. Shown is the older version of the now updated design.

The Trigger Tech Primary trigger that the Ranger 22 comes with is set from the factory at a very crisp 3-pound pull weight and it is protected by an oversized polymer trigger guard. Located in front of the trigger guard, you find an oversized paddle magazine release and magazine well that holds Ruger 10/22 magazines.

And finally, all this sits in a carbon fiber composite stock which comes in two different color schemes (black with grey webbing or tan with black webbing) and features swivel sling studs, a palm swell, ambidextrous grip, a soft Limbsaver recoil pad, and a palm hook.

This rifle is designed in such a way that it would be perfect for competition events as well as for any day-to-day tasks as a shotgun rider.

My Experience While Shooting (and with customer service)

Thanks to my OSS RAD 22 rimfire suppressor, I had a blast shooting the Ranger 22 because it was not only extremely quiet but very accurate. I also found the rifle to be very comfortable, thanks to the ergonomic stock.

I spent a ton of time behind the Ranger 22 sending rounds down range and left with a smile on my face. For the purposes of my testing, I mounted a Viridian 3.5-10×40 SERAC rifle scope.

I had no problems with the Ranger 22… except one: it would not eject any shells. I continued to shoot the Ranger 22 to complete my accuracy testing, but as soon as I was done, I called up Christensen Arms and told them about my issue. They informed me that this was not the first time that they had heard of this problem and that they had a fix already in place.

They sent me a return label and I sent the gun back. About a week passed and they got a repaired and updated rifle back to me that functioned flawlessly.

Changes To the Current Design

Christensen Arms has updated their design of the Ranger 22 to address the issue that I saw with an improved extractor/ejector and by changing the geometry of the bolt face as well as shortening the bolt throw. I did not measure the older design’s bolt throw, but I can tell you that the updated version has a throw of 1.5 inches. This shorter throw helped reduce bolt binding when applying force that is not parallel to the bore. The updated rifles will also feature a pillared stock.

Below, you can see the old bolt design in its rear-most position, followed by the new bolt design in its rear-most position. As you can see, the old design allows the bolt to travel back further.

I am told that these new changes are made to the rifles coming off of the production line currently, but there are a few out there with the older design. If you happen to have issues, Christensen will take care of you and solve your problems in a timely manner.

Future Variations

In my conversation with Christensen, I was delighted to be told that they will be offering the same rifle in 17 HMR and 22 magnum in the near future. We will also be seeing a “youth model” with a 1″ shorter length of pull (LOP).

Accuracy Testing

For my accuracy test, I set the ranger 22 up on a bipod and rear bag in order to be the most stable. I then set a target downrange 50 yards away. In between ammunition transitions, I sent about 5 rounds into the dirt next to the target because sometimes the residue left in the barrel by coated, or non-coated 22 LR bullets, wreaks havoc on the accuracy of the next group. The following pictures show my results:

From left to right: CCI Mini-Mag (0.79 MOA), Federal Game Shok (1.4 MOA), Winchester 36 grain Hollow Point (1.35 MOA), and CCI Quiet (2.93 MOA).
Left to right: Norma Tac 22 (1.28 MOA), Remington 22 Thunderbolt (1.87 MOA), Remington Golden Bullet (1.97 MOA), Federal Auto Match (2.79 MOA) and CCI Green Tag (2.61 MOA).

Unfortunately, with all of the things going on in the world right now I was only able to get my hands on 9 different types of 22 LR ammunition for the review. These were CCI Mini Mag, Federal Game Shok, Winchester Hollow Point, CCI Quiet, Norma Tac22, Remington 22 Thunderbolt, Remington Golden Bullet, Federal Auto Match, and CCI Green Tag. Christensen Arms backs up their Ranger 22 with a 1 MOA guarantee at 50 yards, and many of these hovered around that but only one truly performed better, and that is CCI Mini Mag which put down a 5 round 50 yard group that measured 0.41″ or 0.79 MOA. I’m sure that with more testing of the myriad of different match centered ammunition out there, I would find a few that performed even better than the Mini Mags.



  • 18″ Christensen Arms Carbon Fiber Tension Rimfire Barrel
  • Hand Lapped
  • 22 LR Bentz Math Chamber
  • Threaded muzzle 1/2×28 TPI


  • Christensen Arms Precision Aluminum Receiver
  • 70 degree bolt throw
  • Black Anodized
  • Dual Ejectors
  • Dual Opposing Locking Lugs
  • 0 MOA Optic Handle
  • Trigger Tech Rem 700 Trigger
  • Ruger 10/22 Compatible Magazine


  • 13.75″ LOP
  • Carbon Fiber Composite Rimfire Stock
  • Palm Swell
  • Ambidextrous Grip
  • Libsaver Recoil Pad
  • Flat Forend
  • Sling Studs
  • Palm Hook
  • tan/black and black/grey color options

MSRP: $795.00

Look at how soft the recoil pad on the Ranger 22 is. Not that it kicks hard, but it still adds a level of comfort to the system.

Final Thoughts

After spending quite a bit of time with the Christensen Arms Ranger 22, I have really come to love the rifle. Yes, I had some issues, but Christensen Arms dealt with them promptly and assured me that all current models have had the issue resolved. I had a pleasant experience with their customer service, and because of the pride that they take in their craftsmanship, I am sure that anybody else would find the same.

This Ranger 22 would be great for competitions, squirrel hunting, and everything in between. I had great accuracy results from my own personal testing and I am sure that groups could be shrunken further by simply using a different ammunition type. And of course, because it is not semi-auto, it is a superb suppressor host that yields extremely quiet results. Overall, I am very impressed with the Ranger 22 and I would not hesitate to recommend it to someone who is interested.

Learn more about the Ranger 22 by clicking HERE!

***Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! All Local Sales are FREE!***

Other Pictures:

About the author: Riley Baxter is an avid and experienced hunter, shooter, outdoorsman, and he’s worked in the backcountry guiding for an outfitter. He also get’s a lot of enjoyment out of building or customizing his firearms and equipment. Check out Riley’s Instagram @Shooter300

{ 19 comments… add one }
  • John August 27, 2021, 8:04 pm

    It’s a nice gun. I’ve shot about 1500 rounds from mine after doing their barrel break in procedure. Trigger pull is way to stiff. Can’t wait to change mine out. Accuracy isn’t that great even shooting Fiocchi ammo.

  • Timothy Crochet March 2, 2021, 11:16 am

    Must be very nice to get that level of customer service as a published reviewer as this is not the typical service. Also my rifle is of the modified design and it also suffers the same ejection issue and had a broken mag well. Customer service consists of one line responses that consists of send it in and wait 6 weeks.

    • Riley Baxter July 13, 2021, 2:22 pm

      I’m sorry to hear about this experience. I hope that is not the case for most.

  • Paul Cootauco December 20, 2020, 8:08 pm

    just a question can i use cci stinger ammo on ranger22

    • Riley Baxter July 13, 2021, 2:22 pm

      yep! of course!

  • martianone December 14, 2020, 5:16 am

    IMO- for the overall quality of this rifle, expecting better accuracy/precision.
    Lots of stock 10/22s can meet or beat this, with cheap (“milk carton”) ammo.

  • RRR September 11, 2020, 12:39 pm

    Not so impressive, especially not for the cost of the rifle plus a good scope and mount.

    • T-bone February 4, 2021, 12:14 pm

      Yep. It’s a Remington 700 TriggerTech Field trigger, adjustable down to 2.5lbs.

  • mIke September 11, 2020, 11:37 am

    I may have missed this in reading the article. Mention of Rem 700 trigger…Is that adjustable?

    Thanks to all, esp Riley for another well written article and illustrations….

  • jackkade September 11, 2020, 10:45 am

    Why would a “Gun writer” do a review / Range Test on a “Higher end” rifle with out QUALITY AMMO? ?

    • S.H. Blannelberry September 11, 2020, 11:36 am

      Ammo’s really hard to come by nowadays… if you haven’t noticed.

      • Justin September 13, 2020, 8:33 am

        True 22lr match ammo from Eley, Lapua, and SK is not and has not been hard to get… more than anything I would say it’s the fact most folks don’t want to give $10-$25 a box for it.

    • John ROBERTS September 12, 2020, 12:04 pm

      That gun should shoot 1/2″ or less at 50 yds. with any of that ammo. One ragged hole with some of it.

  • John ROBERTS September 11, 2020, 9:33 am

    My Remington 552 Speedmaster shoots better than that.

  • ejeffreys September 8, 2020, 11:55 am

    MSRP $795 as listed in “SPECS” section of article.

  • Hunter James September 7, 2020, 8:06 pm

    Jose, there was no mention of price. That means the price is probably $1800, scope not included.
    Give me two. They’re small. 😉

  • William Norris September 7, 2020, 7:44 pm

    Nice looking gun…so so accuracy for that kind of money Though 🤔

  • JOSE KENNEDY September 7, 2020, 12:06 pm

    This gun looks like a Home run! I hope that it is much more accurate then how it performed for you. Otherwise it is not worth purchasing. Did this article mention the MSRP?

    • Mark N. September 8, 2020, 12:57 am

      Mine cost $769 plus tax etc. I think that is MSRP. Christensen guarantees sub-moa accuracy at 50 yards.

Leave a Comment

Send this to a friend