Home Turf: Plan for the Worst

Columns Home Defense
Home Turf: Plan for the Worst

Editor’s Note: The following is a syndicated article by author John Caile that first appeared in USCCA’s Concealed Carry Magazine Volume 14, Issue 7, April 2017 under the title, “Home Turf: Plan for the Worst.” 

As a firearms instructor, I have had literally hundreds of discussions with individuals and groups.

In some ways, the term “home defense” is somewhat misleading — “self-defense in the home” would be more accurate. After all, what we are truly concerned about is not the home itself but the safety of the people inside of it.

Watch interviews with individuals who’ve had their homes destroyed by hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes or wildfires. These survivors all tend to express the same sentiment: “Yeah, the house is gone, but thankfully, none of us were hurt.” It’s simply a reality of human nature that only when the worst happens do we realize what matters most to us.

Now there’s nothing wrong with protecting our possessions; that’s why we have safes and insurance policies. But defense in the home should be focused on protecting human life rather than property.

Get into Character

Start by looking at your residence from the viewpoint of a criminal. Do you live in an apartment or condo? If so, is it on the ground floor or an upper floor? Does your building have secure entrances which require a key or magnetic card for entry, or can just anyone walk in, day or night?

If you live in a single-family home or townhouse, how many entry points does it have? If there is a backyard, is it fenced? Excessive landscaping can provide cover for someone intent on burglary … or worse.

Lighting is another issue. In apartments and condos, if you see too many dark areas, express your concerns, in writing, to the property managers. For homes and townhouses, installing motion-sensitive lighting is a relatively inexpensive way to deter potential threats. I know of several neighbors who have infrared trail cameras set up to capture late-night interlopers.

Get to know your neighbors. Especially in multi-unit residences, knowing who is literally a few steps away from you is important. On the plus side, you can keep an eye on each other’s homes, and it might alert you to potential “problem” neighbors.

By the way, many local police or sheriff’s departments will often be willing to do a “walkaround” and point out some of the less obvious weak spots in your property. If possible, arrange such an assessment.

The Basics

It sounds almost absurdly obvious, but having good locks is essential. However, they only work if you actually use them. The number of robberies and sexual assaults that occur simply because people forget (or neglect) to lock their doors is staggering. In fact, police reports show that one of the most common points of entry for invaders is through an unlocked sliding glass patio door.

Home alarm systems are simpler, more effective and more affordable than ever. Some include surveillance cameras; consider using them, with or without monitoring services. As with most things in life, prevention beats cure, so deterrence of an attack in the first place is better in pretty much every conceivable way than having to engage in a gunfight.

Dogs are another great deterrent. Interviews with criminals in prison have shown that they all hate dogs. Even a small one can inflict a nasty bite, not to mention alert neighbors. Here again, think like a criminal: Would you want to risk meeting someone’s not-so-friendly Rottweiler? Even if you don’t have a dog, a “Beware of Dog” sign (better yet, an “I Love My Pit Bull” sign) can be an effective deterrent. And if you have a yard, a large water dish with a name like Magnum or Odin painted on the side can be remarkably effective, all for just a couple of bucks.

Any Time is Crime Time

One of the most common mistakes that people make is assuming that bad things only happen at night, and this is partly caused by media brain-washing. Whether a TV drama or a commercial for an alarm service, the scenario always unfolds in the dark, and the “bad guy” is invariably dressed in black, wearing a ski mask and usually carrying a tire iron. It’s literally become a cliché; all he’s missing is the black-and-white-striped “burglar shirt.”

Reality is quite different. Back when I lived in the Chicago area, one serial rapist limited his attacks to midday hours, usually between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. He would first scout a subdivision to determine which residences contained women who were always home alone during the day (often “work-at-home” moms). He attacked and victimized dozens of women over several months.

In his mid-30s, he would dress in a jogging suit and running shoes, fitting in perfectly with the upscale neighborhood where joggers were a common sight. After forcing his way in and assaulting the women, he left them tied up and gagged. When he was finally caught and interrogated, he told the police that all he had to do was knock, because “80 percent of the time, they just opened the door.”

But what was particularly illuminating was that at least two of his victims testified that they had firearms in the house. Unfortunately, in both instances, the guns were tucked away in their bedrooms. As we’ve seen all too many times, merely owning a gun is not enough.

Have a Plan

It’s a good idea to establish family safety protocols, especially if you have teenagers. Make sure everyone, friends included, who has access to your home knows the “house rules” about entering, particularly late at night (such as always immediately identifying themselves), as well as other basic dos and don’ts. One of the most important of these is to never open the door to a stranger, even during the daytime and certainly not because he or she simply looks or sounds “legit.”

Even an official-looking uniform with an I.D. card is no guarantee. Sexual predators have impersonated delivery people, utility workers and even cops. If someone shows up without you requesting his or her presence, ask who he or she represents and call the company before opening the door. Doing so only takes a moment, and it can prevent a lifetime of tragedy.

It’s important here to distinguish between “burglars” and truly terrifying home invaders. Burglars just want stuff; they don’t want to confront a homeowner, especially one who might be armed. As a result, you are unlikely to encounter a burglar except by chance, like if you unexpectedly come home sick in the middle of the day. Though such encounters can turn violent, most actual burglars would rather flee than fight.

The ones we need to be the most concerned about are the truly evil actors, the sexual predators and violent sociopaths. Unlike burglars, these ruthless creatures actually hope you are home … for reasons darker than most of us would care to imagine.

Legally Speaking

OK, you lock your doors, you have an alarm system, you have a dog (or appear to) and you have established safety rules and procedures for everyone in the household. What else should you do to protect yourself, especially when it comes to the legal system?

Keep your guns properly stored when not in use. If you have children but want your gun instantly available, consider one of those quick-release gun safes — I recommend the mechanical (number-coded) versions, since, when you go analog, you don’t have to worry about dead batteries.

Have a high-intensity flashlight alongside (or attached to) your in-home firearm. It can temporarily blind an attacker, and, even more importantly, it will help you see what you are about to shoot, which can prevent you from making a terrible mistake. When creeping around armed in the dark, too many people have unintentionally shot intoxicated neighbors or, worse, their own children. Simple as it sounds, a strong light absolutely must be part of your home-defense equipment.

Your Home is Not a ‘Free Fire’ Zone

Be warned that, contrary to some internet myths, while statutes like the Castle Doctrine are good ideas, they do not represent “get-out-of-jail-free” cards. All common-law self-defense principles still apply. Numerous cases of homeowners shooting and killing persons in their residences have resulted in manslaughter and even murder charges. In one case, a homeowner was convicted because he ambushed two unarmed teenagers. In another, the homeowner unnecessarily left the safety of his domicile to “investigate” a noise out in the garage, ending with him shooting yet another unarmed youth.

In one bizarre case, a man went further, setting a trap in his detached garage, complete with motion detectors and a woman’s purse as “bait.” When he left his house and ended up killing a young man in the garage, he too was convicted of murder. Remember, statutes (or even “case law”) won’t be determining your guilt — a jury will.

Finally, before the worst happens, make sure you know exactly how to call 911 and what to say (and not say) when the police arrive. And, of course, have a criminal defense attorney’s number in your cellphone and in your wallet, and call them immediately after you call 911. Then, follow your attorney’s instructions to the letter.

Lethal force, even in the home, should always be a last resort. Be prepared. Be smart. Be safe.

Discover how you can join nearly 300,000 responsibly armed Americans who already rely on the USCCA to protect their families, futures and freedoms: USCCA.com/gunsamerica.

***Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! All Local Sales are FREE!***

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • William Lockridge December 17, 2018, 2:34 pm

    I am a retired police detective from a city in the State of Ohio. I find one of the above posts especially disturbing. I won’t elaborate any further than to say property NEVER trumps a human life, even that of a thieving scumbag. That’s why you have insurance. Unfortunately, too many experts nowadays actually advocate for shooting, and likely killing someone, for stealing something from them. Newsflash, there IS NO death penalty offense for property crimes. Another point to consider is that many states having the Castle Doctrine, or similar statute on the books also differentiate between occupied and unoccupied structures. Learn the difference, it’s important. Let me tell you my friends, you go outside to your garage (unoccupied structure) and shoot an unarmed teen trying to hotwire your lawnmower, and you ARE going to jail, plain and simple. You’re only saving grace would be if said suspect was much larger or picks up a a piece of pipe or some other object and actually tries to assault you. In that situation you have a fair case for self defence, especially if you’re elderly or physically disabled to the point that it makes it all but impossible for you to defend yourself in any other fashion. As a disabled and somewhat elderly police veteran of many years I absolutely cringe when I hear people advocating taking someone’s life for stealing from them.
    I’m not going to go into detail but I do know exactly how it feels to have to take a life and, believe me when I say, you don’t ever want to know. I don’t care how justified your actions were or even if they hang a medal around your neck you WILL pay a price for many, many, years to come. Other than my and my families physical safety there is nothing that I own that I would be willing to kill to keep. That’s why I have insurance. I have surveillance cameras covering just about every square foot of my property both inside and out so there is no need for me to go outside the relative safety of my residence to “investigate” anything. We have police where I live as do you I imagine and that would be their job. My job is to protect myself and my family, period. If you trip my alarm system this place lights up like a Christmas Tree and sounds like the entire fire department is pulling in the driveway. If that doesn’t deter you then you likely have something on your mind other than just stealing my TV, and that will likely get you killed.

    If you’re getting your training/information from some self proclaimed “expert” whose qualifications amount to shooting some holes in paper and reading a couple of books and that instructor advocates for taking a life over a property crime then it is extremely likely that he or she has has never had to defend their life with a firearm, or by any other method for that matter. They may, in fact, be the “psychopath” that the poster was referring to and if you are that anxious to get to shoot someone then the “psychopath” may be the one sitting in your chair.

    If what I’ve written seems a little harsh, it was intended to be. If it wakes even one person up, it’s worth it because it’s exactly that kind of talk that encourages liberals and gun grabbers (one-in-the-same really) to keep up their assault on law abiding citizen’s rights. Because of my prior employment and some incidents connected with it, I am never without a firearm even in my own home, and yet, I pray every night that I never have to use it again. Remember this, when you take up a gun against another person you are literally standing in the place of God so before you decide to pull that trigger you had better make damn sure you’re right.

  • DocLoch December 14, 2018, 3:03 pm

    I appreciate the effort put into this article to delineate some of the effective means of Home defense.

    I would like to point out for the record, however, that a home is not defined the same as a house. The home includes a plethora of other things including the inhabitants who have a relationship to each other that indicated feelings and family. The author attempts to equate home with house. The term Home Defense is very adequate as it stands.

    Secondly, the ability to defend property is becoming very skewed and in my opinion evil in this country and in the author’s viewpoint (or at least his stated viewpoint). We need to start reversing the VERY short-sighted idea that property is not worth defending.

    The argument is: A life is more valuable than property. This has several pitfalls, because the issue is more complex. First, not all life has the same value. Otherwise we would allow criminals to remain alive when they showed murderous tendency. Their life is by default not worth keeping around based on risk involved. Safety in reality is NOT FIRST! Evaluation of risk versus benefit is key! If safety truly were “first” then even life would be second, correct? This obvious conundrum points out the fallacy. It’s about personal judgement, via risk vs. benefit evaluation.

    This reality is difficult for many naive and poorly educated (often by universities–poorly educated) persons to face. When property is devalued below the life of thieves, then the problem becomes what happens when you let that thief go and he goes to your neighbor’s and kills them to get their property. You had the opportunity and ability to save the more valuable life of your neighbor, and you failed. I guarantee that you will feel guilty, and if you don’t, then I don’t want you to be my neighbor…EVER!

    This is only one scenario. There are others and many reasons why the right to life AND PROPERTY were originally enshrined in the initial government of this land mass.

    I am no longer going to let these fatal ideas go by without comment. “The narrative” is the new currency of the realm and I’m going to help vend it!

  • David Telliho December 14, 2018, 7:10 am

    thank you, i concur. the last thing, the very last thing i`d ever want to do, would be to hurt someone. one famous sheriff once said don`t pull a gun unless you`re going to pull the trigger. i`ve frozen folks in their tracks with a look. the look was more intimidating than the gun on my hip. once,the start of the motion to draw,stopped a person. i will shoot,i have shot, i will shoot again, if there is no other way.

Send this to a friend