Parents of Victim And Brady Campaign Sue Gun Shop for Illegal Actions of Straw Purchaser 

The Brady Center To Prevent Gun Violence along with the parents of a victim of the Oxford High School shooting are suing a Michigan gun shop for selling a firearm to a straw purchaser. 

The complaint names Acme Shooting Goods LLC, and alleges it was negligent when it sold a firearm to the father of the minor who perpetrated the attack last November. 

“Specifically, upon information and belief, Acme ignored one or more ‘red flags’ that the sale was unlawful and could foreseeably result in a juvenile using the firearm to cause injury and damage,” says Brady in a press release.

“The suit seeks damages to account for his care and injury as well as injunctive relief to reform the reckless practices that contributed to the mass shooting,” it continued. 

In other words, the plaintiffs argue the gun shop should have known or even knew the buyer, James Crumbley, was going to give his son Ethan access to the firearm so that Ethan could use it to kill four classmates and wound a dozen others. 

As one local Metro Detroit gun shop owner indicated to Fox2Detroit, the plaintiffs may have a hard time proving their case in court.  

SEE ALSO: Arizona Homeowner Shoots, Kills Two Intruders

“I’m finding a lot of difficulty with that because gun store owners have a lot of money invested in these stores,” said Kucyk, the owner of Action Impact Firearms. “And you’re not going to risk your livelihood, your business, your employees’ livelihood, for one gun transaction, you’re not going to.”

Existing federal law, under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), explicitly protects firearm manufacturers and retailers from the criminal misuse of lawfully sold firearms.   

Crumbley, the perpetrator’s father, is an adult and presumably passed a background check at the point of sale.  It’s not exactly clear how ACME should have known it would wind up in the hands of his deranged son.  Pending further developments or evidence, ACME is, therefore, likely to be protected under the PLCAA. 

Nevertheless, attorneys for the family believe they have a case.  

“Acme Shooting Goods started the sequence of events that led to the tragedy by providing a gun to a minor that never should have had access through, in all likelihood, a straw sale against both state and federal law,” attorneys Matthew Turner and Lisa Esser from Sommers Schwartz, P.C. said in a press release.

While there have been numerous lawsuits filed in response to the attack, this is the first one filed against the gun shop.

Stay tuned for updates.

***Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! All Local Sales are FREE!***

About the author: S.H. Blannelberry is the News Editor of GunsAmerica.

{ 4 comments… add one }
  • paul I'll call you what I want/1st Amendment July 3, 2022, 8:00 am

    They will probably win because they will find an equally (as the shooter) deranged judge to try the case. Right or wrong doesn’t mean a thing now a days! Mind reading and prognostication seems to be the cornerstone of society! I must have have cut school on that day when they were teaching that…….

  • EasyEddie July 1, 2022, 11:09 am

    Liability for this tragic event lies with the lad’s father. The gun store owner is guilty of not being able to clearly see the future. Dad, had he been observant, could have known that his son should not have ready access to a firearm, and secured it safely. Maybe he did, I don’t know. Could not General Motors and Anheuser Busch be similarly liable for the gentleman that drives his Chevy pick-up after having too many Buds?

  • Big Al 45 July 1, 2022, 10:35 am

    Those are some pretty foolish lawyers.
    Apparently, they haven’t really read or looked at cases concerning ‘straw purchases’, or they would know that a person would have to have PREVIOUS information or knowledge of the person who is receiving the firearm as being ineligible.
    So technically, it was NEVER a straw purchase.
    AND there are NO provisions for prosecution of the FFL holder under that law, so really it may even just get kicked out of Court.

  • Laddyboy July 1, 2022, 6:56 am

    The MISINFORMATION IS FLOWING LIKE A TIDLE FLOOD! This wording “could foreseeably result” is a way of saying — all gun selling stores are responsible for all future injurious actions. These GUN CONTROLLERS are leaving out an important FACT — INDIVIDUALS ARE RESPONSIBE FOR THEIR OWN ACTIONS. Especially those individuals who are ===== WANTON TO HARM OTHERS!!
    When a WANTON CRIMINAL commits an act of VIOLENCE in SECONDS — The Police are only MINUTES or HOURS AWAY!
    Nationwide Concealed Carry MUST be REINSTALLED WITH Qualified Immunity when an individual is FORCED to defend themselves or other INNOCENT Americans.

Leave a Comment

Send this to a friend