Dana Loesch Moving from CA Home Over ‘Rape You to Death’ Threats from Anti-Gunners

NRA News commentator Dana Loesch is leaving her California home after she received numerous death threats from anti-gunners. The outspoken conservating and pro-gun advocate took to Twitter to share her frustration.

“Spent my weekend preparing to move due to repeated threats from gun control advocates,” she tweeted

One man set up several social media accounts, posted photos of her residence and threatened to “rape” Loesch “to death.” Another anti-gunner told her that he would hunt her down, assault her and her children.

That was enough for her to say goodbye to the Golden State. But at least one gun control advocate spoke up to condemn the chuckleheads threatening Loesch.

SEE ALSO: Left Freaking Out Over Dana Loesch’s ‘Clenched Fist of Truth’ Ad

Chelsea Clinton, the daughter of former president Bill Clinton and former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, said that “this is all awful & unacceptable.”

Chelsea added, “Those of us who disagree with you the strongest have a particular responsible [sic] to strongly condemn.”

Loesch thanked the police for their help and assistance during what must be a very difficult time. Presumably, she’ll be relocating to a more gun-friendly state where she won’t have to worry about death threats from hoplophobic wackadoos.

About the author: S.H. Blannelberry is the News Editor of GunsAmerica.

{ 41 comments… add one }
  • ejharb August 28, 2018, 11:32 am

    Dana is one of my favorite talkhosts! I hope these dip wads get what they deserve without forcing her or her very lucky husband to kill them.this woman seriously trains and is quite likely better than most commenting here so there isn’t going to be any raping going on.the last thing he’ll see is her sad face as he bleeds out.

  • Mike Watkins April 20, 2018, 1:31 pm

    Z, from your unending string of comments, it appears you have a serious hard-on for Dana Loesch.

    You must be the sick bastard who threatened to “rape her to death.”

    Hopefully someone close to you will recognize you from your rants and see that you get the help you need.

  • Mike Watkins April 20, 2018, 1:23 pm

    Even courageous people have to think of their kids, when deciding whether to fight or get to a safer place.

    I suspect the threats are empty, from overweight 35 year-old liberal slacker sacks of shit who live in their Mom’s basements, spending their days trolling on the internet.

    But taking chances with your kids lives isn’t brave, it’s stupid.

  • Dale Johnson October 21, 2017, 1:19 pm

    Given the right wing penchant for constant fear of everything and everybody, their bigotry against anyone different than their lazy asses, and their hysterical belief in nonsensical conspiracy theories while being manipulated by Liers and conmen, she probably made it all up.

  • Beachhawk October 21, 2017, 12:21 am

    I was surprised to hear that Dana Loesch lives in the People’s Republic of Kalifornia. I hope she is moving to a more gun-friendly state.

  • Al scott October 20, 2017, 8:16 pm

    Why the heck does she live in the communist state of ca.

  • Z October 20, 2017, 1:56 pm

    Lemme get this straight. Dana Loesch, the tough talking woman featured in NRA adds against the, “anti gun” people is fleeing the state? Didn’t she say, “…the only way to confront this violence of lies is with the clenched fist of truth.” What happened to letting the cops do their job? Why not get the FBI involved? I thought the whole idea was that owning firearms made people capable of defending themselves, their families and their property. Stand your ground Dana. Show the courage of your conviction.

    • Jeff October 20, 2017, 3:18 pm

      Responsible people put their children’s lives first. Stand your ground …yes, but only after the kids are in a safe place first.

      • Z October 20, 2017, 5:09 pm

        I understand the need to protect her children, however, the rhetoric is “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun”. No addendum, no exceptions, no qualifying remarks, none of that, “what he meant was…”, only the sentiment that owning firearms enables you to defend yourself, your family, and your property and therefore it’s inherently justified and necessary. Dana Loesch moving out of her home when faced with social media threats and phone calls in spite of being a paid spokesperson for the NRA is no less hypocritical than Diane Feinstein calling for a ban on gun ownership while employing armed security personnel. Neither of them has the courage of their stated conviction.

        • Roy Burton October 20, 2017, 8:17 pm

          A responsible gun owner only uses his or her firearm as a last resort, after all other options fail. To take another person’s life takes a heavy toll on the soul. So as I see it there is nothing hypocritical or weak about trying to avoid an assault. Plus, owning a firearm does not automatically mean you will come out on top in a deadly situation.

        • Jeff October 20, 2017, 10:04 pm

          Is California a state that has a castle doctrine? I doubt it. Hard to ‘stand your ground’ in a state that favors the ‘right’ of rapists and other criminals to occupy your home while you are in it. California is no place for people with families any more.

          • Cal2A April 21, 2018, 2:08 pm

            Yes, CA definitely has a Castle doctrine.

            I was extremely surprised to learn recently that CA also has a Stand Your Ground provision, in case law (although not in statutes). Not that I’d care to test it.

        • DKNoffsinger October 21, 2017, 1:36 am

          Please remember that you are talking about the state of California, where it is far more important to protect the rights of the criminal than to actually allow a citizen to exercise their right to self defense let alone the right to protect one’s family. In fact, it may be illegal in many jurisdictions to fail to attempt to flee prior to engaging an aggressor.

      • Z October 20, 2017, 5:48 pm

        “Yes, men are stronger, which is why I train and carry a gun. It is my ultimate equalizer.” Dana Loesch

    • Hugo October 20, 2017, 6:39 pm

      She’s probably concerned that some left wing coward (like you) will shoot her in the back. Hard to defend against that type of evil.

      • Z October 20, 2017, 8:47 pm

        Left wing coward? I see you’re part of the shoot your mouth off, think later, crowd. You brave keyboard warrior.
        The fact is, the NRA is a business they preys upon people’s fears and insecurities, people like you. But hey, keep sending them your money. I’m done with them. Now I support gun rights groups at the state level. Groups that work to change legislation instead of spending my contribution on bs advertising campaigns their own spokes people don’t live up too.

    • MrQuiet April 21, 2018, 2:06 pm

      @Z: “what happened to letting the cops do their job?” — are you kidding us? That question perfectly illustrates how the problem just flies over the illogical head of those who are opposed to lawful possession of firearms. The issue is summed up nicely in one short phrase: “When seconds counts, the *police* are only minutes away”. Not to mention, even the Supreme Court has stated that the police do NOT have a duty to protect individuals. They provide extremely valuable service to society, but you cannot rely on them being there when you need them *during a life-threatening emergency situation*. It is *our* individual duty to protect ourselves, no one else’s duty. (not to mention, if you turn that over to govermnent, the gov’t will abuse that power)

      I live in a very firearm-*un*friendly area of the country — yet even our own police, after there were break-ins in the area, recommended that we get training and acquire appropriate firearm(s), to protect ourselves and our family. The *police* recommend that. Even in a very anti-gun part of the country. (re why — see above)

      But Dana’s situation has been taken up another level — when whackos are threatening your *kids*, how can you possibly protect them 24×7 unless you live in the White House and have the Secret Service protecting them? Or are one of the Hollywood elite who believe so strongly in the 2nd Amendment that they hire armed guards for themselves and/or their children? She did what she had to do to protect her kids — because in the face of anonymous, credible threats from madmen, the police could not guarntee their safety, and neither could she and her husband.

      The people making the threats have abused their First Amendment rights, and should have them taken away. (just as anyone who abuses their 2nd Amendment rights by instigating a violent act should have those rights revoked — but the courts are doing a lousy job of enforcing both)

      Isn’t it interesting how it’s always the left-leaning *anti*-firearm crowd who make violent threats and act out violently? Virtually all mass shooters lean to the left. These anti-firearm people make threats. Antifa (what a joke — they ARE fascist) is violent. I’m afraid to ever visit Portland, due to their violent left-wing protests (read: riots). Firearm owners tend to be the most civilized, polite, and responsible of our citizens.

  • bjg October 20, 2017, 1:52 pm

    Typical left wing scum.

  • George October 20, 2017, 1:18 pm

    What is the evidence that these threats come from ‘anti gunners’? Would they threaten with guns? This sounds more like a Putin operation.

  • ~ Occams October 20, 2017, 11:18 am

    It appears anti-gunners are quite violent.

    But they’re getting their wish. Despite what the US CONSTITUTION says, the Jan 1 laws will make almost everything illegal in California, and subject to seizure, so I guess states aren’t subject to the US Constitution?

    It would appear so.

    A taste of the coming insanity:


    • Z October 20, 2017, 1:59 pm

      If you read the constitution you’ll find the part about whatever rights are not enumerated as belonging to the federal government are inherent to the states. There’s nothing in the constitution about on-line ammunition sales.

  • Cliff October 20, 2017, 11:08 am

    Do these lunatics not understand that their existence is a perfectly justifiable reason for any decent, honest person to want to have a firearm for self defense? Do these people not realize that threatening to rape someone to death for having a particular opinion is one reason why some people want access to the tools necessary for effective self defense?

    • Z October 20, 2017, 2:00 pm

      Do you not realize that anyone who would threaten to rape someone to death for having an opinion isn’t remotely concerned with the irony of their threat?

  • joefoam October 20, 2017, 9:43 am

    Wait, I thought the liberals were the tolerant ones. Apparently not.

  • DIYinSTL October 20, 2017, 9:31 am

    What the heck is she doing in Kalifornia? I’m sure that after leaving St. Louis a few years ago she was talking about how great it was to live in Texas. Is she no longer with Glenn Beck’s organization? Her website says “The Dana Show: The Conservative Alternative from Dallas …” Yeah, I know, you can broadcast from anywhere in the world but Dana living in CA does not pass the smell test.

  • Mad Mac October 20, 2017, 9:19 am

    It is disappointing that Dana is choosing to move because of tweets and phone calls. Those cowards are hiding behind their smart phones. If they were going to do anything, they would have done it without sending a warning. What will you do when they find your new home? Which they will. All this attention is what they want. They’ve won. And it risks stirring a nutcase into taking action. Good luck, Dana.

  • david October 20, 2017, 9:18 am


    • Z October 20, 2017, 1:21 pm

      1) Caps lock doesn’t give weight to your comments.
      2) Do you honestly believe Barrack Obama or George Soros are personally funding a threat campaign against Dana Loesch? That’s some serious conspiracy theory bs.

  • mauser6863 October 20, 2017, 8:54 am

    Yup, Commiefornia sucks. Best to leave now before they force you to stay, like East Germany.

    Dana is more than welcome to cross the border into Arizona and live in a free state, where you enjoy civil rights and civil discourse. We have a large gun culture here and guns are “Normal”. I was in a Best Buy yesterday and one of the customers had a Walther P99 on his hip for all to see, no big deal and no one cared.

    Besides the political and civil rights reasons to relocate here, freedom makes everything better, from buying gas, driving to work and taking your kids to school. Having lived in California all my life, the last 5 in Arizona has revealed the overwhelming extent of California’s oppression that infiltrates every aspect of a person’s life. It’s good to be free.

    I love loving in America, everyone should be so free. Good luck Dana.

  • MJB October 20, 2017, 8:52 am

    My question is why are you living in that socialist state to begin with? It’s the land of fruits and nuts and a prime example of what America would be like if demorats had their way in the rest of the country. Everybody needs to vote republican even if you don’t care for the candidate because a CA way of life would be your alternative. I shudder to think!

  • Infidel762x51 October 20, 2017, 8:02 am

    The tolerant, peaceful left. Just like the muslims they love so much.

    • Z October 20, 2017, 1:26 pm

      I absolutely love the lack of awareness that goes along with comments like yours. The shooter in Vegas was a millionaire who voted republican and he killed people attending a country music concert put on by a Christian radio station. Yup, your logic is sound. All republican voters hate Christian radio and country music. Not sure you could find a broader brush to paint with but you get an A for effort.

      • Gary October 20, 2017, 4:07 pm

        The last time he voted as a Democrat in Florida .

  • Robert J. Lucas October 20, 2017, 7:55 am

    Everyone of those death threats via the United States Postal Service is considered evidence in each case as a federal crime.
    The same holds true with the verbal threats over the communication networks. FCC guidelines.
    Life Long NRA Member!

    • Z October 20, 2017, 1:28 pm

      The USPS wasn’t mentioned in the article.

  • Gunflint01 October 20, 2017, 7:41 am

    Today’s Democrats are instruments of violence …period. They conspired to kill police, they have insulted, disrespected our Veterans & our Country.. They have incited riots, & threatened the President with bodily harm. They have become an evil cult, & must be taken out by any means necessary. We have the instrument to do so..
    18 U.S.C. § 2381 : US Code –
    Section 2381: ———–Treason ———
    Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war
    against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and
    comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason
    and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five
    years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and
    shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
    18 U.S.C. § 2384 : US Code –
    Section 2384: ————-Seditious conspiracy——-
    If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place
    subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to
    overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the
    United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force
    the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the
    execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize,
    take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the
    authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or
    imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

    • Matt October 21, 2017, 4:30 pm

      What do you mean by “taken out by any means necessary”.

  • Altoid October 20, 2017, 6:34 am

    Chelsea – “This is awful and unacceptable”
    Really? This is the position Chelsea supports, while saying that she doesn’t. Looks like she learned treachery well from her parents.

    • Z October 20, 2017, 1:34 pm

      What if I told you it is possible to advocate for a thing without supporting extremism on behalf of the thing. It’s not an all or nothing equation. For example, you can advocate against sexual assault without supporting the castration of any consenting adults who have sex.

  • SuperG October 18, 2017, 11:33 am

    That’s California for you. Psychos and criminals rule. If you are not a criminal or a cop, there is no point in being there. If you move to Oregon, don’t go to Multnomah County, and don;t tailgate! 🙂

    • JoeUSooner October 20, 2017, 11:50 am

      Kalifornia is like a bowl of cereal. Take away all the fruits and nuts, and what’s left is flakes.

Leave a Comment

Send this to a friend